High Variability in the Use of Cement for Femoral Stem Fixation in Hip Fractures—An Analysis of the Canadian Joint Replacement Registry

<b>Background</b>: This study examines current trends in Canada using data from the Canadian Joint Replacement Registry (CJRR) and includes a national survey to understand the varied uptake of cement for femoral stem fixation. <b>Methods</b>: The survey was available online and the website link was distributed to all orthopaedic surgeons through the Canadian Orthopaedic Association between September and December 2022. The CJRR obtained data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), and information pertaining to patients 55 years of age and older who underwent hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture in Canada between April 2017 and March 2022 was used. <b>Results</b>: Most respondents practiced in an academic community setting (52%). Only 53% of respondents reported using cement, and 71% indicated that cemented fixation was the best practice. The main reasons for using uncemented stems were less operative time (23%), cement disease concerns (11%), and surgeons' comfort (10%). Similarly, CJRR data showed only 51% cemented fixation among 42,386 hemiarthroplasties performed between 2017 and 2022. The proportion of cemented implants varied by province, but overall, the increase in the use of cement from 2017 to 2022 was from 42.9% to 57.7%. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study demonstrates variability in the use of cement for femoral fixation despite solid evidence showing improved outcomes using cement. Some of the main reasons in favour of uncemented stems include operative time, surgical training, and concerns about cement disease. Establishing clear position statements and guidelines supporting cemented fixation may be prudent to build universal consensus on this practice.