Between Rapprochement and Demarcation: The Bektashis' Ambivalent Approach to Sunnism in the Long Nineteenth Century

ABSTRACT: The Bektashi Order faced significant challenges in the nineteenth century following its official ban in 1826 during the abolition of the Janissary Corps. The Ottoman state cited religious grounds for this prohibition and, in collaboration with ulema scholars, engaged in discursive exclusion, portraying the Bektashis as heretical, morally corrupt, and politically dangerous. This discrimination was coupled with religious disciplinary attempts to assimilate Bektashism into Sunnism. The Bektashis responded to this religious discrimination and efforts at Sunnitization in varied ways. Some reinforced their distinct boundaries from Sunni Islam, emphasizing their nonconformist traditions. Others, especially in the latter half of the nineteenth century, sought to integrate Bektashism with Sunni Islam, adapting ritual catechisms, doctrines, and historical narratives to align more closely with Sunni perspectives. This paper examines these negotiation processes within the Bektashi Order, exploring the dynamics between conformism and nonconformism.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2979/tur.00049
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Rapprochement and Demarcation: The Bektashis' Ambivalent Approach to Sunnism in the Long Nineteenth Century

Cem Kara
Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association
Islamic Studies and History
article

Between Rapprochement and Demarcation: The Bektashis' Ambivalent Approach to Sunnism in the Long Nineteenth Century

Cem Kara
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The Bektashi Order faced significant challenges in the nineteenth century following its official ban in 1826 during the abolition of the Janissary Corps. The Ottoman state cited religious grounds for this prohibition and, in collaboration with ulema scholars, engaged in discursive exclusion, portraying the Bektashis as heretical, morally corrupt, and politically dangerous. This discrimination was coupled with religious disciplinary attempts to assimilate Bektashism into Sunnism. The Bektashis responded to this religious discrimination and efforts at Sunnitization in varied ways. Some reinforced their distinct boundaries from Sunni Islam, emphasizing their nonconformist traditions. Others, especially in the latter half of the nineteenth century, sought to integrate Bektashism with Sunni Islam, adapting ritual catechisms, doctrines, and historical narratives to align more closely with Sunni perspectives. This paper examines these negotiation processes within the Bektashi Order, exploring the dynamics between conformism and nonconformism.

Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies AssociationVol. 11(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Between Rapprochement and Demarcation: The Bektashis' Ambivalent Approach to Sunnism in the Long Nineteenth Century — Cem Kara · Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS