“Asking for help feels like a weakness”: factors shaping first-year students’ expectations of STEM course office hours

Office hours are one of the most ubiquitous resources for students in STEM courses. However, there has been only limited work examining what students think of STEM course office hours, and we are not aware of any past work that has examined (1) how students perceive STEM course office hours upon entering college, and (2) how these perceptions change over time and the factors that shape these perceptions and expectations of what will occur in office hours. Here, we utilize a longitudinal series of surveys to capture first-year students’ perceptions and expectancies for office hours at the beginning of college, after one semester, and at the end of their first year, drawing upon expectancy-value theory to situate our results. We identify that most new first-year students enter college with moderate or high self-reported familiarity with office hours, and that the level of familiarity increases throughout the year. New first-year students hold a variety of conceptions about office hours, some correct (e.g., associating office hours as a space for getting help on course content) and some likely incorrect (e.g., office hours as an independent study hall), that likely shape students’ expectancies, perceived benefits, and costs of attending office hours. We also find that most new first-year students hold positive attitudes towards STEM course office hours, and that some students’ perceptions are likely shaped by some secondary schools implementing office hours during the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, we determine that most students who attend office hours report them as helpful and increasing their self-efficacy in the course, with students providing a variety of reasons for how office hours impacted their self-confidence (e.g., through increased content knowledge, better relationship with the instructor, greater metacognitive reflection.). Our work provides the first examination of how new first-year students perceive STEM course office hours, and the first longitudinal study that tracks their changes in perception over time. We highlight implications and recommendations for STEM course instructors to increase their office hours engagement throughout, drawing upon our results and expectancy-value theory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of STEM Education
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00561-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Asking for help feels like a weakness”: factors shaping first-year students’ expectations of STEM course office hours

Jeremy Hsu, Melissa Rowland‐Goldsmith, Rebecca M. Green, Elaine Benaksas Schwartz et al.
1 citations
International Journal of STEM Education
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
8.93
article

“Asking for help feels like a weakness”: factors shaping first-year students’ expectations of STEM course office hours

Jeremy Hsu, Melissa Rowland‐Goldsmith, Rebecca M. Green, Elaine Benaksas Schwartz, Grace Holick
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Office hours are one of the most ubiquitous resources for students in STEM courses. However, there has been only limited work examining what students think of STEM course office hours, and we are not aware of any past work that has examined (1) how students perceive STEM course office hours upon entering college, and (2) how these perceptions change over time and the factors that shape these perceptions and expectations of what will occur in office hours. Here, we utilize a longitudinal series of surveys to capture first-year students’ perceptions and expectancies for office hours at the beginning of college, after one semester, and at the end of their first year, drawing upon expectancy-value theory to situate our results. We identify that most new first-year students enter college with moderate or high self-reported familiarity with office hours, and that the level of familiarity increases throughout the year. New first-year students hold a variety of conceptions about office hours, some correct (e.g., associating office hours as a space for getting help on course content) and some likely incorrect (e.g., office hours as an independent study hall), that likely shape students’ expectancies, perceived benefits, and costs of attending office hours. We also find that most new first-year students hold positive attitudes towards STEM course office hours, and that some students’ perceptions are likely shaped by some secondary schools implementing office hours during the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, we determine that most students who attend office hours report them as helpful and increasing their self-efficacy in the course, with students providing a variety of reasons for how office hours impacted their self-confidence (e.g., through increased content knowledge, better relationship with the instructor, greater metacognitive reflection.). Our work provides the first examination of how new first-year students perceive STEM course office hours, and the first longitudinal study that tracks their changes in perception over time. We highlight implications and recommendations for STEM course instructors to increase their office hours engagement throughout, drawing upon our results and expectancy-value theory.

International Journal of STEM EducationVol. 12(1)
Chapman University (US)
National Science Foundation, Chapman University
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Evaluation of Teaching Practices
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.