A Tale of Open Science: Emergence of a New Normal

Abstract This paper explores the transformative journey of open science in reshaping research credibility and replicability. Using psychology’s “replication crisis” as a cautionary tale, we discuss the emergence of open science as a movement aimed at reinforcing transparency and rigor in research practices. Through a discussion of open science principles and practices, we highlight both the successes and challenges that psychology faced in adopting these methods. The paper then draws parallels to business research, proposing open science as a necessary evolution to enhance trust and provide actionable insights in fields such as entrepreneurship, sustainability, and digitalization. We invite business researchers to embrace open science’s potential, not only to address emerging credibility concerns but also to redefine the impact and reliability of their findings across research fields and industries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-025-00218-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Tale of Open Science: Emergence of a New Normal

Oliver Genschow, Susanne Adler, Meikel Soliman, Marko Sarstedt et al.
2 citations
Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
2.80
article

A Tale of Open Science: Emergence of a New Normal

Oliver Genschow, Susanne Adler, Meikel Soliman, Marko Sarstedt, Monika Imschloß, Doreen Siegfried
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the transformative journey of open science in reshaping research credibility and replicability. Using psychology’s “replication crisis” as a cautionary tale, we discuss the emergence of open science as a movement aimed at reinforcing transparency and rigor in research practices. Through a discussion of open science principles and practices, we highlight both the successes and challenges that psychology faced in adopting these methods. The paper then draws parallels to business research, proposing open science as a necessary evolution to enhance trust and provide actionable insights in fields such as entrepreneurship, sustainability, and digitalization. We invite business researchers to embrace open science’s potential, not only to address emerging credibility concerns but also to redefine the impact and reliability of their findings across research fields and industries.

Schmalenbach Journal of Business ResearchVol. 77(4)
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), ZBW – Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft (DE), Babeș-Bolyai University (RO), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
2.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.