Comparative Modeling of Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries Using Multiple Linear Regression and Random Forest Algorithms

This paper presents a comparative study of data-driven modeling approaches for vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs), utilizing Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF) algorithms. Experimental voltage–capacity datasets from a 1 kW/1 kWh VRFB system were digitized, processed, and used for model training, validation, and testing. The MLR model, built using eight optimized features, achieved a mean error (ME) of 0.0204 V, a residual sum of squares (RSS) of 8.87, and a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.1796 V on the test data, demonstrating high predictive performance in stationary operating regions. However, it exhibited limited accuracy during dynamic transitions. Optimized through out-of-bag (OOB) error minimization, the Random Forest model achieved a training RMSE of 0.093 V and a test RMSE of 0.110 V, significantly outperforming MLR in capturing dynamic behavior while maintaining comparable performance in steady-state regions. The accuracy remained high even at lower current densities. Feature importance analysis and partial dependence plots (PDPs) confirmed the dominance of current-related features and SOC dynamics in influencing VRFB terminal voltage. Overall, the Random Forest model offers superior accuracy and robustness, making it highly suitable for real-time VRFB system monitoring, control, and digital twin integration. This study highlights the potential of combining machine learning algorithms with electrochemical domain knowledge to enhance battery system modeling for future energy storage applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy storage and applications
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/esa2030011
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced battery technologies research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Modeling of Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries Using Multiple Linear Regression and Random Forest Algorithms

Afshin Izadian, Ammar A. Ali, Sohel Anwar
1 citations
Energy storage and applications
Advanced battery technologies research
0.73
article

Comparative Modeling of Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries Using Multiple Linear Regression and Random Forest Algorithms

Afshin Izadian, Ammar A. Ali, Sohel Anwar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative study of data-driven modeling approaches for vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs), utilizing Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF) algorithms. Experimental voltage–capacity datasets from a 1 kW/1 kWh VRFB system were digitized, processed, and used for model training, validation, and testing. The MLR model, built using eight optimized features, achieved a mean error (ME) of 0.0204 V, a residual sum of squares (RSS) of 8.87, and a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.1796 V on the test data, demonstrating high predictive performance in stationary operating regions. However, it exhibited limited accuracy during dynamic transitions. Optimized through out-of-bag (OOB) error minimization, the Random Forest model achieved a training RMSE of 0.093 V and a test RMSE of 0.110 V, significantly outperforming MLR in capturing dynamic behavior while maintaining comparable performance in steady-state regions. The accuracy remained high even at lower current densities. Feature importance analysis and partial dependence plots (PDPs) confirmed the dominance of current-related features and SOC dynamics in influencing VRFB terminal voltage. Overall, the Random Forest model offers superior accuracy and robustness, making it highly suitable for real-time VRFB system monitoring, control, and digital twin integration. This study highlights the potential of combining machine learning algorithms with electrochemical domain knowledge to enhance battery system modeling for future energy storage applications.

Energy storage and applicationsVol. 2(3)
University of Indianapolis (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Advanced battery technologies research
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.