Impact of Donor Age on Graft Failure After Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation by Donor-Recipient Sex Combinations: An Analysis of the UNOS OPTN Database

<b>Background</b> Sex disparity has been highlighted in personalized medicine for various human diseases including acute/chronic liver diseases. In the transplant community, greater graft failure risk in female-to-male liver transplantation (LT) has been repeatedly reported, and a recent study in living donor LT reported that the inferiority of female-to-male LT is shown only when donor age is ≤40 y. We aimed to analyze the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database to test if the poorer outcome of female-to-male LT changes by donor age of 40 y in deceased donor LT, as shown in living donor LT. <b>Methods</b> In this retrospective cohort study, 11,752 adult patients in the UNOS registry who underwent deceased donor LT between 2000-2023 were analyzed. Multivariable analysis was performed to adjust the effects from transplant years, graft ischemia time, disease severity, and others. The primary outcome was graft failure. <b>Results</b> Within the subgroup of recipients with ≤40 y donors, graft failure risk was significantly greater in female-to-male LT than others (vs. female-to-female, HR = 1.43 [1.16-1.76], <i>p</i> < 0.001; vs. male-to-female, HR = 1.46 [1.18-1.81], <i>p</i> < 0.001; vs. male-to-male, HR = 1.26 [1.16-1.49], <i>p</i> = 0.009). In contrast, within the subgroup of recipients with >40 y donors, the risk was comparable between female-to-male LT and other donor-recipient sex groups (vs. female-to-female, <i>p</i> = 0.907; vs. male-to-female, <i>p</i> = 0.781; vs. male-to-male, <i>p</i> = 0.937). We tested various cutoff donor ages and determined that 40 y is the best cutoff value to define the risk subgroup in female-to-male LT. <b>Conclusions</b> In the current study, we found that the sex disparity shown in living donor LT is also observed in deceased donor LT. That is, post-transplant graft failure risk was greater in female-to-male LT than other donor-recipient sex groups only when donor age was ≤40 y. In contrast, graft failure risk was comparable irrespective of donor-recipient sex combinations when donor age was >40 y.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080357
Primary Topic
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Donor Age on Graft Failure After Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation by Donor-Recipient Sex Combinations: An Analysis of the UNOS OPTN Database

Vatche G. Agopian, Ji‐Hye Kwon, Sangbin Han, Justin A. Steggerda et al.
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
article

Impact of Donor Age on Graft Failure After Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation by Donor-Recipient Sex Combinations: An Analysis of the UNOS OPTN Database

Vatche G. Agopian, Ji‐Hye Kwon, Sangbin Han, Justin A. Steggerda, Jin Soo Rhu, Yi‐Te Lee, Gaab Soo Kim, Irene K. Kim, Amy Sanford, Ju-Dong Yang
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b> Sex disparity has been highlighted in personalized medicine for various human diseases including acute/chronic liver diseases. In the transplant community, greater graft failure risk in female-to-male liver transplantation (LT) has been repeatedly reported, and a recent study in living donor LT reported that the inferiority of female-to-male LT is shown only when donor age is ≤40 y. We aimed to analyze the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database to test if the poorer outcome of female-to-male LT changes by donor age of 40 y in deceased donor LT, as shown in living donor LT. <b>Methods</b> In this retrospective cohort study, 11,752 adult patients in the UNOS registry who underwent deceased donor LT between 2000-2023 were analyzed. Multivariable analysis was performed to adjust the effects from transplant years, graft ischemia time, disease severity, and others. The primary outcome was graft failure. <b>Results</b> Within the subgroup of recipients with ≤40 y donors, graft failure risk was significantly greater in female-to-male LT than others (vs. female-to-female, HR = 1.43 [1.16-1.76], <i>p</i> < 0.001; vs. male-to-female, HR = 1.46 [1.18-1.81], <i>p</i> < 0.001; vs. male-to-male, HR = 1.26 [1.16-1.49], <i>p</i> = 0.009). In contrast, within the subgroup of recipients with >40 y donors, the risk was comparable between female-to-male LT and other donor-recipient sex groups (vs. female-to-female, <i>p</i> = 0.907; vs. male-to-female, <i>p</i> = 0.781; vs. male-to-male, <i>p</i> = 0.937). We tested various cutoff donor ages and determined that 40 y is the best cutoff value to define the risk subgroup in female-to-male LT. <b>Conclusions</b> In the current study, we found that the sex disparity shown in living donor LT is also observed in deceased donor LT. That is, post-transplant graft failure risk was greater in female-to-male LT than other donor-recipient sex groups only when donor age was ≤40 y. In contrast, graft failure risk was comparable irrespective of donor-recipient sex combinations when donor age was >40 y.

Journal of Personalized MedicineVol. 15(8)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Samsung Medical Center (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.