Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Large Language Model Guidance for Patients on Breast Cancer Surgery Preparation and Recovery

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Accurate and accessible perioperative health information empowers patients and enhances recovery outcomes. Artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, have garnered attention for their potential in health communication. This study evaluates the accuracy and readability of responses generated by ChatGPT to questions commonly asked about breast cancer. <b>Methods:</b> Fifteen simulated patient queries about breast cancer surgery preparation and recovery were prepared. Responses generated by ChatGPT (4o version) were evaluated for accuracy by a pool of breast surgeons using a 4-point Likert scale. Readability was assessed with the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings. <b>Results:</b> Of the 15 responses evaluated, 11 were rated as "accurate and comprehensive", while 4 out of 15 were deemed "correct but incomplete". No responses were classified as "partially incorrect" or "completely incorrect". The median FKGL score was 11.2, indicating a high school reading level. While most responses were technically accurate, the complexity of language exceeded the recommended readability levels for patient-directed materials. <b>Conclusions:</b> The model shows potential as a complementary resource for patient education in breast cancer surgery, but should not replace direct interaction with healthcare providers. Future research should focus on enhancing language models' ability to generate accessible and patient-friendly content.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155411
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Large Language Model Guidance for Patients on Breast Cancer Surgery Preparation and Recovery

Alberto Marchet, Matteo Cagol, Silvia Michieletto, Francesco Milardi et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
2.09
article

Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Large Language Model Guidance for Patients on Breast Cancer Surgery Preparation and Recovery

Alberto Marchet, Matteo Cagol, Silvia Michieletto, Francesco Milardi, Darío Gregori, Tania Saibene, Giulia Lorenzoni, Stefania Lando, Elena Palmarin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Accurate and accessible perioperative health information empowers patients and enhances recovery outcomes. Artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, have garnered attention for their potential in health communication. This study evaluates the accuracy and readability of responses generated by ChatGPT to questions commonly asked about breast cancer. <b>Methods:</b> Fifteen simulated patient queries about breast cancer surgery preparation and recovery were prepared. Responses generated by ChatGPT (4o version) were evaluated for accuracy by a pool of breast surgeons using a 4-point Likert scale. Readability was assessed with the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings. <b>Results:</b> Of the 15 responses evaluated, 11 were rated as "accurate and comprehensive", while 4 out of 15 were deemed "correct but incomplete". No responses were classified as "partially incorrect" or "completely incorrect". The median FKGL score was 11.2, indicating a high school reading level. While most responses were technically accurate, the complexity of language exceeded the recommended readability levels for patient-directed materials. <b>Conclusions:</b> The model shows potential as a complementary resource for patient education in breast cancer surgery, but should not replace direct interaction with healthcare providers. Future research should focus on enhancing language models' ability to generate accessible and patient-friendly content.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(15)
University of Padua (IT), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
2.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.