Beliefs in oral cancer in an adult population in Medellín, Colombia: a cross-sectional study

Background: Oral cancer ranks 16th among the most frequent malignant neoplasms worldwide, with a mortality rate of 54% within the first 5 years after diagnosis. It is crucial to develop strategies to improve cure and survival rates. Objective: To develop, validate, and apply an instrument on beliefs about oral cancer to guide future educational, promotional, and preventive activities for this disease. Methods: Cross-sectional study in 318 adults. Content was validated using Lawshe's criteria, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to assess structural validity. Internal consistency was calculated with Cronbach's Alpha. Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare medians of dimensions based on demographic variables. Results: The final instrument included 18 items across three dimensions (threat, benefits, and cues to action), with adequate fit indicators: RMSEA: 0.051 (95% CI: 0.038–0.063), CFI: 0.93, TLI: 0.916, SRM: 0.063. Internal consistency was good (Alpha between 0.65 and 0.85). 67.3% of participants were women. Significant differences were observed between men and women ( p = 0.040) and between participants over and under 40 years old ( p < 0.001), in perceived threat as well as in cues to action ( p < 0.001). Conclusion: The Oral Cancer Belief Instrument demonstrated adequate validity and consistency, making it a reliable tool for promoting health prevention strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/mbcb/2025028
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beliefs in oral cancer in an adult population in Medellín, Colombia: a cross-sectional study

Luz Stella Giraldo Cardona, Miguel Angel Alzate Agudelo, Nancie L. González, Laura María Estrada Tabares et al.
Journal of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Beliefs in oral cancer in an adult population in Medellín, Colombia: a cross-sectional study

Luz Stella Giraldo Cardona, Miguel Angel Alzate Agudelo, Nancie L. González, Laura María Estrada Tabares, Gloria Jeanette Álvarez Gómez, Arbey Aristizábal, María Alejandra Díaz Narváez, Mabel Andrea Ramos Zamora, María Fernanda Mejía Ardila
article en

Abstract

Background: Oral cancer ranks 16th among the most frequent malignant neoplasms worldwide, with a mortality rate of 54% within the first 5 years after diagnosis. It is crucial to develop strategies to improve cure and survival rates. Objective: To develop, validate, and apply an instrument on beliefs about oral cancer to guide future educational, promotional, and preventive activities for this disease. Methods: Cross-sectional study in 318 adults. Content was validated using Lawshe's criteria, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to assess structural validity. Internal consistency was calculated with Cronbach's Alpha. Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare medians of dimensions based on demographic variables. Results: The final instrument included 18 items across three dimensions (threat, benefits, and cues to action), with adequate fit indicators: RMSEA: 0.051 (95% CI: 0.038–0.063), CFI: 0.93, TLI: 0.916, SRM: 0.063. Internal consistency was good (Alpha between 0.65 and 0.85). 67.3% of participants were women. Significant differences were observed between men and women ( p = 0.040) and between participants over and under 40 years old ( p < 0.001), in perceived threat as well as in cues to action ( p < 0.001). Conclusion: The Oral Cancer Belief Instrument demonstrated adequate validity and consistency, making it a reliable tool for promoting health prevention strategies.

Journal of Oral Medicine and Oral SurgeryVol. 31(3)
Saint Martin University (CO), Universidad de Antioquia (CO)
Universidad de Antioquia
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.