Healthcare under fire: quantifying the impact of violence on medical services in facilities supported by International Medical Corps in three prefectures of Central African Republic, 2016–2020

This study shows improved identification and profiling of attacks is possible in low-resource settings and presents several approaches to quantify their impact. It also highlights challenges conducting analysis with significant limitations in data quality and availability. Findings reinforce the urgent need for systematic data collection, real-time monitoring, tailored, context-specific mitigation strategies, and support to local actors who maintain services when external support is limited. Future research should build on these findings to provide more effective protection, mitigation, and recovery strategies for healthcare systems in conflict zones.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict and Health
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-025-00686-w
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health and Conflict Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare under fire: quantifying the impact of violence on medical services in facilities supported by International Medical Corps in three prefectures of Central African Republic, 2016–2020

Leonard Rubenstein, Pierre Somsé, Natalya Kostandova, Jennifer OKeeffe et al.
2 citations
Conflict and Health
Health and Conflict Studies
5.63
article

Healthcare under fire: quantifying the impact of violence on medical services in facilities supported by International Medical Corps in three prefectures of Central African Republic, 2016–2020

Leonard Rubenstein, Pierre Somsé, Natalya Kostandova, Jennifer OKeeffe, Audrey Mahieu, Larissa Fast, Blaise Bienvenu Ali, Odilon Guesset Bingou, Gerard Mbonimpa, Sebastien Dackpa, Thierry Fikiri, Christian Mulamba
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study shows improved identification and profiling of attacks is possible in low-resource settings and presents several approaches to quantify their impact. It also highlights challenges conducting analysis with significant limitations in data quality and availability. Findings reinforce the urgent need for systematic data collection, real-time monitoring, tailored, context-specific mitigation strategies, and support to local actors who maintain services when external support is limited. Future research should build on these findings to provide more effective protection, mitigation, and recovery strategies for healthcare systems in conflict zones.

Conflict and HealthVol. 19(1)
University of Geneva (CH), International Medical Corps (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Bangui (CF)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Health and Conflict Studies
5.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Healthcare under fire: quantifying the impact of violence on medical services in facilities supported by International Medical Corps in three prefectures of Central African Republic, 2016–2020 — Leonard Rubenstein, Pierre Somsé, et al. · Conflict and Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS