Latent Classes of Lifetime Use of Seven Hallucinogens in the United States

Interest in and use of hallucinogens appears to be growing in the United States, yet less is known about the use of multiple hallucinogens. The aims of this study are to characterize subgroups of lifetime hallucinogen use and to identify sociodemographic correlates of these subgroups. Latent class models were fit using 2021-2022 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) data on a sub-sample of individuals who reported having ever used any hallucinogen (<i>n</i> = 17,977). A four-class model identified the following subgroup classes: <i>Psilocybin</i> (16%), <i>LSD/Psilocybin</i> (46%), <i>Ecstasy</i> (23%), and a fourth class (15%) labeled <i>Multiple substances</i>, with high probabilities of use of psilocybin, LCD, and ecstasy, in addition to moderate probabilities of use of other hallucinogens. In survey-weighted multinomial logistic regression analyses, compared to the <i>Psilocybin</i> class, the adjusted odds of being in the <i>LSD/Psilocybin</i> class increased with age-group level (AORs = 1.5-6.4, 95% CIs:1.3-8.7), and non-White participants had higher odds of being in the <i>Ecstasy</i> class (AORs = 1.7-3.2, 95% CIs:1.1-4.4). As policies regulating and clinical practice with hallucinogens continue to evolve, these patterns of lifetime hallucinogen use demonstrate the overlapping nature of hallucinogen experiences in the U.S. population, which has implications for expanding clinical trial inclusion criteria and establishing a baseline for future trends.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2025.2537040
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychedelics and Drug Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Latent Classes of Lifetime Use of Seven Hallucinogens in the United States

B. Anderson, Meredith C. Meacham, Allison R. Coker, Juan Carlos C. Montoy et al.
1 citations
Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
Psychedelics and Drug Studies
2.31
article

Latent Classes of Lifetime Use of Seven Hallucinogens in the United States

B. Anderson, Meredith C. Meacham, Allison R. Coker, Juan Carlos C. Montoy, Maha N. Mian, Ralph C. Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Interest in and use of hallucinogens appears to be growing in the United States, yet less is known about the use of multiple hallucinogens. The aims of this study are to characterize subgroups of lifetime hallucinogen use and to identify sociodemographic correlates of these subgroups. Latent class models were fit using 2021-2022 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) data on a sub-sample of individuals who reported having ever used any hallucinogen (<i>n</i> = 17,977). A four-class model identified the following subgroup classes: <i>Psilocybin</i> (16%), <i>LSD/Psilocybin</i> (46%), <i>Ecstasy</i> (23%), and a fourth class (15%) labeled <i>Multiple substances</i>, with high probabilities of use of psilocybin, LCD, and ecstasy, in addition to moderate probabilities of use of other hallucinogens. In survey-weighted multinomial logistic regression analyses, compared to the <i>Psilocybin</i> class, the adjusted odds of being in the <i>LSD/Psilocybin</i> class increased with age-group level (AORs = 1.5-6.4, 95% CIs:1.3-8.7), and non-White participants had higher odds of being in the <i>Ecstasy</i> class (AORs = 1.7-3.2, 95% CIs:1.1-4.4). As policies regulating and clinical practice with hallucinogens continue to evolve, these patterns of lifetime hallucinogen use demonstrate the overlapping nature of hallucinogen experiences in the U.S. population, which has implications for expanding clinical trial inclusion criteria and establishing a baseline for future trends.

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs
University of California, San Francisco (US), University of California System (US)
Food and Drug Administration
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Psychedelics and Drug Studies
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.