Definitions, Methods, and Strategies to Examine Engagement: Progress and Future Directions for Research on Evaluation

ABSTRACT Engagement is regarded as a core practice that can enhance the quality, utility, and relevance of evaluation. However, more research is needed to provide empirical guidance on designing effective engagement approaches for various communities. Expanding on a prior systematic review, this scoping review examined the current empirical landscape and knowledge gaps of RoE on engagement to (a) identify how engagement has been defined to clarify key concepts, (b) describe methodological and contextual characteristics of studies used to examine engagement, and (c) characterize engagement strategies utilized. Twenty‐seven studies were included and coded for synthesis. Based on the review's findings, recommendations to drive future RoE agendas should (a) develop standards for empirical examinations of engagement, (b) determine conditions for successful partner selection, (c) measure engagement outcomes, and (d) apply innovative RoE methods and designs to broaden the empirical basis. Advancing these focus areas can address persistent gaps in RoE on engagement and strengthen the impact of evaluations that can foster meaningful community collaborations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Directions for Evaluation
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.70006
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Definitions, Methods, and Strategies to Examine Engagement: Progress and Future Directions for Research on Evaluation

Jessica S. Saucedo, Tatiana E. Bustos, Esther Nolton
2 citations
New Directions for Evaluation
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
4.21
article

Definitions, Methods, and Strategies to Examine Engagement: Progress and Future Directions for Research on Evaluation

Jessica S. Saucedo, Tatiana E. Bustos, Esther Nolton
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Engagement is regarded as a core practice that can enhance the quality, utility, and relevance of evaluation. However, more research is needed to provide empirical guidance on designing effective engagement approaches for various communities. Expanding on a prior systematic review, this scoping review examined the current empirical landscape and knowledge gaps of RoE on engagement to (a) identify how engagement has been defined to clarify key concepts, (b) describe methodological and contextual characteristics of studies used to examine engagement, and (c) characterize engagement strategies utilized. Twenty‐seven studies were included and coded for synthesis. Based on the review's findings, recommendations to drive future RoE agendas should (a) develop standards for empirical examinations of engagement, (b) determine conditions for successful partner selection, (c) measure engagement outcomes, and (d) apply innovative RoE methods and designs to broaden the empirical basis. Advancing these focus areas can address persistent gaps in RoE on engagement and strengthen the impact of evaluations that can foster meaningful community collaborations.

New Directions for EvaluationVol. 2025(187)
RTI International (US), Health Strat (Kenya) (KE), Michigan State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Definitions, Methods, and Strategies to Examine Engagement: Progress and Future Directions for Research on Evaluation — Jessica S. Saucedo, Tatiana E. Bustos, et al. · New Directions for Evaluation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS