Bloody Forecast: Daily Blood Demand Prediction Using Various Modeling Approaches

Sufficient blood supply is critical not only for scheduled surgeries, but also for emergency medical interventions. In our study, we focus on predicting the daily blood demand separately for two blood types: A+ and O-, based on data from the Transfusion and Tissue Department of University Hospital Brno. The dataset consisted of data on blood demand from 2021 to 2024 and was extended by data regarding non-working days, national and school holidays, seasons, and influenza epidemics. The performance of various prediction models was measured using the normalized Mean Absolute Error (nMAE), which reflects the average prediction error relative to the average daily blood demand. When tested on data from 2023, the best performance was achieved by linear regression models, with a nMAE of 26% for A+ and 50% for O-, indicating lower predictability for blood types with smaller populations. Interestingly, models for different blood types use different features, as the demand for individual blood types depends on different factors. Despite relatively high nMAE values, the models still outperformed a ”qualified guess” approach based only on historical averages.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13164/eeict.2025.72
Primary Topic
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bloody Forecast: Daily Blood Demand Prediction Using Various Modeling Approaches

Martina Daňková, Stanislava Košková
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
article

Bloody Forecast: Daily Blood Demand Prediction Using Various Modeling Approaches

Martina Daňková, Stanislava Košková
article en

Abstract

Sufficient blood supply is critical not only for scheduled surgeries, but also for emergency medical interventions. In our study, we focus on predicting the daily blood demand separately for two blood types: A+ and O-, based on data from the Transfusion and Tissue Department of University Hospital Brno. The dataset consisted of data on blood demand from 2021 to 2024 and was extended by data regarding non-working days, national and school holidays, seasons, and influenza epidemics. The performance of various prediction models was measured using the normalized Mean Absolute Error (nMAE), which reflects the average prediction error relative to the average daily blood demand. When tested on data from 2023, the best performance was achieved by linear regression models, with a nMAE of 26% for A+ and 50% for O-, indicating lower predictability for blood types with smaller populations. Interestingly, models for different blood types use different features, as the demand for individual blood types depends on different factors. Despite relatively high nMAE values, the models still outperformed a ”qualified guess” approach based only on historical averages.

Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Forecasting Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.