Comparison of Direct and Indirect Identification of a Human Driver Model

This paper focuses on recent advancements in the identification of human dynamics in vehicle steering tasks. The field of human driver identification encompasses a plethora of distinct models and methods for parameter identification. This study experimentally compares the most prominent identification approaches in terms of model efficiency (ME). The advantages of indirect identification methods are theoretically discussed and experimentally verified using a dataset comprising extensive measurements from 23 individual drivers. Both theoretical analysis and numerical evaluation of ME corroborate that the indirect identification method proposed by the author is superior to the direct methods employed in many previous studies. The suggested approach is expected to provide a more reliable estimate of drivers’ dynamic parameters, which are desirable for further statistical analyses or machine learning applications in this research domain.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13164/eeict.2025.236
Primary Topic
Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Identification of a Human Driver Model

Jakub Čelko
Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
article

Comparison of Direct and Indirect Identification of a Human Driver Model

Jakub Čelko
article en

Abstract

This paper focuses on recent advancements in the identification of human dynamics in vehicle steering tasks. The field of human driver identification encompasses a plethora of distinct models and methods for parameter identification. This study experimentally compares the most prominent identification approaches in terms of model efficiency (ME). The advantages of indirect identification methods are theoretically discussed and experimentally verified using a dataset comprising extensive measurements from 23 individual drivers. Both theoretical analysis and numerical evaluation of ME corroborate that the indirect identification method proposed by the author is superior to the direct methods employed in many previous studies. The suggested approach is expected to provide a more reliable estimate of drivers’ dynamic parameters, which are desirable for further statistical analyses or machine learning applications in this research domain.

Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.