Balloon‐Expandable Versus Self‐Expanding Valves in Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis: Insights From the SWEDEHEART Registry
Both BEVs and SEVs were feasible with similar clinical outcomes in BAV stenosis. SEVs had better hemodynamic outcomes but more paravalvular leakage. Randomized trials are needed to determine the optimal valve choice.
Authors
- Sebastian Völz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9609-5360)
- Henrik Hagström
- Dan Ioanes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9953-7726)
- Truls Råmunddal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9483-5962)
- Anna Myredal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5179-1506)
- Kristofer Skoglund (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9095-1218)
- Magnus Settergren (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7731-6730)
- Pétur Pétursson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0807-9406)
- Stefan Karl James (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4413-9736)
- Oskar Angerås (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3474-2438)
- Araz Rawshani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2066-3533)
- Antros Louca (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7699-593X)
- Joakim Sundström (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7951-7430)
- Sasha Koul
Institutions
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Skåne University Hospital (SE)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Umeå University (SE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Published
- 2025-08-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70073
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.39