Learning Model based on Multiple Intelligences oriented towards Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) through the application of Visual, Auditory, Read-Write Preferential, Kinesthetic (VARK), and Directed Reading Listening Thinking Activity (DRLTA) in

The purpose of this study was to develop a learning model based on multiple intelligences and students' critical thinking skills through visual, auditory, preferential read-write, kinesthetic (VARK) learning strategies, and the application of the directed reading listening thinking activity (DRLTA) model to elementary school students. The stages include: 1) formulating research problems and determining survey objectives, 2) determining concepts and hypotheses and digging literature, 3) sampling, 4) making kueisoner, 5) field work, 6) data processing, 7) analysis and reporting. The result of the need assessment score is 3.54, the product development stage, FGD, expert and practitioner validation and the field trial stage. The feasibility of this model is tested based on: 1) The assessment of psychologists is assessed based on three aspects, namely the elements of the supporting theory used, the elements of the learning stages and the elements of the implementation of learning techniques to get a score of 4.77 or including "very feasible" to use. 2) Assessment of education practitioners is also assessed based on three aspects of getting a score of 4.33 or including "very feasible" to use. 3) Field trial assessment based on four aspects, namely, Multiple Intelligences detection, learning methods and learning media. Field trials were carried out with the individual trial stage getting a score of 3.56 including "very feasible", group field trials resulting in a score of 3.59 including "very feasible" and limited field trials getting a score of 3.8 including "very feasible" to use. The framework in this study is based on quantitative and qualitative research in accordance with the objectives to be achieved, the research problems to be solved, and the nature of the data required. The use of a mixed method approach is based on research coverage and research problems. In accordance with the objectives and research problems and the nature of the data collected, this study used a two phase design. The reason for using this design is that it allows theoretically and practically the development of two designs in a position to complement each other, equal, and be implemented sequentially.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research and Innovation in Social Science Education Journal (RISSEJ)
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30595/rissej.v3i1.257
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Methods and Media Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning Model based on Multiple Intelligences oriented towards Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) through the application of Visual, Auditory, Read-Write Preferential, Kinesthetic (VARK), and Directed Reading Listening Thinking Activity (DRLTA) in

Cici Murniasih, Suhartono Suhartono, Hanafi Hanafi, Moch. Noviadi Nugroho
1 citations
Research and Innovation in Social Science Education Journal (RISSEJ)
Educational Methods and Media Use
3.25
article

Learning Model based on Multiple Intelligences oriented towards Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) through the application of Visual, Auditory, Read-Write Preferential, Kinesthetic (VARK), and Directed Reading Listening Thinking Activity (DRLTA) in

Cici Murniasih, Suhartono Suhartono, Hanafi Hanafi, Moch. Noviadi Nugroho
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a learning model based on multiple intelligences and students' critical thinking skills through visual, auditory, preferential read-write, kinesthetic (VARK) learning strategies, and the application of the directed reading listening thinking activity (DRLTA) model to elementary school students. The stages include: 1) formulating research problems and determining survey objectives, 2) determining concepts and hypotheses and digging literature, 3) sampling, 4) making kueisoner, 5) field work, 6) data processing, 7) analysis and reporting. The result of the need assessment score is 3.54, the product development stage, FGD, expert and practitioner validation and the field trial stage. The feasibility of this model is tested based on: 1) The assessment of psychologists is assessed based on three aspects, namely the elements of the supporting theory used, the elements of the learning stages and the elements of the implementation of learning techniques to get a score of 4.77 or including "very feasible" to use. 2) Assessment of education practitioners is also assessed based on three aspects of getting a score of 4.33 or including "very feasible" to use. 3) Field trial assessment based on four aspects, namely, Multiple Intelligences detection, learning methods and learning media. Field trials were carried out with the individual trial stage getting a score of 3.56 including "very feasible", group field trials resulting in a score of 3.59 including "very feasible" and limited field trials getting a score of 3.8 including "very feasible" to use. The framework in this study is based on quantitative and qualitative research in accordance with the objectives to be achieved, the research problems to be solved, and the nature of the data required. The use of a mixed method approach is based on research coverage and research problems. In accordance with the objectives and research problems and the nature of the data collected, this study used a two phase design. The reason for using this design is that it allows theoretically and practically the development of two designs in a position to complement each other, equal, and be implemented sequentially.

Research and Innovation in Social Science Education Journal (RISSEJ)Vol. 3(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Educational Methods and Media Use
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.