Intersecting perspectives: A participatory street review framework for urban inclusivity

Urban demographic changes, evolving multiculturalism, and heightened tourism flows have underscored the importance of designing public streets that serve heterogeneous populations. Despite municipal policies advocating equity and universal access, many streetscapes still fall short of accommodating the wide-ranging practical and cultural differences that exist among diverse user groups. This paper introduces and applies a participatory methodology—“Street Review”—designed to capture how individuals from varying social positions evaluate an array of streets within a multicultural metropolis. Grounded in the context of Montréal, known for its overlapping layers of historic and modern neighborhoods, multilingual communities, and continual inflows of short-term visitors, this framework draws upon qualitative interviews, focus groups, and a systematic rating of street images by 12 participants. The analyses focus on perceived inclusivity, accessibility, aesthetics, and practicality for both long-term residents (post-occupancy) and newcomers or suburban visitors (pre-occupancy). Findings from examining 20 selected streets (represented through 60 vantage points) indicate that most streetscapes offer moderate levels of user-friendliness, with only a handful of locations scoring especially low on supporting vulnerable populations or signaling cultural welcome. A smaller subset approached higher performance in certain areas but rarely satisfied all participant groups. In situating these results within global debates around inclusive urban design, public space, and the interplay of tourism with social equity, we illustrate how group-based deliberations can generate constructive insights and spotlight deeper conflicts rooted in identity, memory, and everyday mobility. These reflections inform planners and policymakers in striving for streets that address the convergence of diverse user experiences and emerging global challenges in urban policy. • Introduces “Street Review” using group & individual methods for inclusive design. • Reveals no single street meets all diverse, intersectional user needs. • Group sessions negotiate inclusivity, calibrate evaluations & build shared understanding. • Contrasts pre-vs. post-occupancy views to uncover shifting inclusivity. • Informs planners on equitable, context-specific, diversity-sensitive street design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Habitat International
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2025.103536
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersecting perspectives: A participatory street review framework for urban inclusivity

Rashid Mushkani, Shin Alexandre Koseki
1 citations
Habitat International
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
4.20
article

Intersecting perspectives: A participatory street review framework for urban inclusivity

Rashid Mushkani, Shin Alexandre Koseki
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Urban demographic changes, evolving multiculturalism, and heightened tourism flows have underscored the importance of designing public streets that serve heterogeneous populations. Despite municipal policies advocating equity and universal access, many streetscapes still fall short of accommodating the wide-ranging practical and cultural differences that exist among diverse user groups. This paper introduces and applies a participatory methodology—“Street Review”—designed to capture how individuals from varying social positions evaluate an array of streets within a multicultural metropolis. Grounded in the context of Montréal, known for its overlapping layers of historic and modern neighborhoods, multilingual communities, and continual inflows of short-term visitors, this framework draws upon qualitative interviews, focus groups, and a systematic rating of street images by 12 participants. The analyses focus on perceived inclusivity, accessibility, aesthetics, and practicality for both long-term residents (post-occupancy) and newcomers or suburban visitors (pre-occupancy). Findings from examining 20 selected streets (represented through 60 vantage points) indicate that most streetscapes offer moderate levels of user-friendliness, with only a handful of locations scoring especially low on supporting vulnerable populations or signaling cultural welcome. A smaller subset approached higher performance in certain areas but rarely satisfied all participant groups. In situating these results within global debates around inclusive urban design, public space, and the interplay of tourism with social equity, we illustrate how group-based deliberations can generate constructive insights and spotlight deeper conflicts rooted in identity, memory, and everyday mobility. These reflections inform planners and policymakers in striving for streets that address the convergence of diverse user experiences and emerging global challenges in urban policy. • Introduces “Street Review” using group & individual methods for inclusive design. • Reveals no single street meets all diverse, intersectional user needs. • Group sessions negotiate inclusivity, calibrate evaluations & build shared understanding. • Contrasts pre-vs. post-occupancy views to uncover shifting inclusivity. • Informs planners on equitable, context-specific, diversity-sensitive street design.

Habitat InternationalVol. 164
Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Fonds de recherche du Québec, Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.