The Impact of Agricultural Finance on Adopting Climate Change Mitigation Practices: Comparative Approach Evidence From Jordan

This study aimed to demonstrate the impact of agricultural financing on the adoption of climate change mitigation practices. The study sample consisted of two categories: 151 tomato producers in the Deir Alla region of the Jordan Valley (Jordan) who received agricultural financing, and another 175 tomato producers who did not receive such financing in the same area. To achieve its objectives, the study adopted the descriptive analytical approach by showing the current situation of tomato crop production in Jordan and the study area. A comparative approach was adopted in the study. The level of climate change mitigation practices adoption and the values of some important financial indicators at the farm level for the study sample categories were determined. The gross margin (GM), the net farm income (NFI), trends of inputs and outputs, and farm financial efficiency indicators were calculated. The study results revealed that the profit margin and net farm income for farms that received agricultural financing were better than those that did not. The trend of inputs and outputs indicated that the financial efficiency of the farms that received agricultural financing was at a moderate sustainable level compared to a low level of sustainability for the farms that did not receive such financing. The results also showed that the debt-to-asset ratio in the farms that received financing was at a sufficient degree of financial sustainability that enables them to continue their activities without being affected by the risks of not paying their debts, compared to the farms that did not receive financing. The study concluded that agricultural financing has a significant impact on covering the costs of practices to mitigate the potential effects of climate change, which reflects positively on improving the productive performance of the agricultural activities and transferring them to a better level of financial sustainability. The study recommended the need to take the necessary measures to facilitate access to finance for farmers, especially smallholder farmers, to cover the costs of measures to face the unexpected risks arising from climate change.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agricultural Science
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v17n9p57
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Agricultural Finance on Adopting Climate Change Mitigation Practices: Comparative Approach Evidence From Jordan

Ali Al-Sharafat, Samah K. Qadorah
Journal of Agricultural Science
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

The Impact of Agricultural Finance on Adopting Climate Change Mitigation Practices: Comparative Approach Evidence From Jordan

Ali Al-Sharafat, Samah K. Qadorah
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to demonstrate the impact of agricultural financing on the adoption of climate change mitigation practices. The study sample consisted of two categories: 151 tomato producers in the Deir Alla region of the Jordan Valley (Jordan) who received agricultural financing, and another 175 tomato producers who did not receive such financing in the same area. To achieve its objectives, the study adopted the descriptive analytical approach by showing the current situation of tomato crop production in Jordan and the study area. A comparative approach was adopted in the study. The level of climate change mitigation practices adoption and the values of some important financial indicators at the farm level for the study sample categories were determined. The gross margin (GM), the net farm income (NFI), trends of inputs and outputs, and farm financial efficiency indicators were calculated. The study results revealed that the profit margin and net farm income for farms that received agricultural financing were better than those that did not. The trend of inputs and outputs indicated that the financial efficiency of the farms that received agricultural financing was at a moderate sustainable level compared to a low level of sustainability for the farms that did not receive such financing. The results also showed that the debt-to-asset ratio in the farms that received financing was at a sufficient degree of financial sustainability that enables them to continue their activities without being affected by the risks of not paying their debts, compared to the farms that did not receive financing. The study concluded that agricultural financing has a significant impact on covering the costs of practices to mitigate the potential effects of climate change, which reflects positively on improving the productive performance of the agricultural activities and transferring them to a better level of financial sustainability. The study recommended the need to take the necessary measures to facilitate access to finance for farmers, especially smallholder farmers, to cover the costs of measures to face the unexpected risks arising from climate change.

Journal of Agricultural ScienceVol. 17(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Impact of Agricultural Finance on Adopting Climate Change Mitigation Practices: Comparative Approach Evidence From Jordan — Ali Al-Sharafat, Samah K. Qadorah · Journal of Agricultural Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS