Anonymity in the Age of AI

Artificial intelligence (AI) is eroding traditional de-identification practices by enabling accurate re-identification of images, text and behavioural traces. A systematic review of 64 peer-reviewed studies published between 2013 and 2025—47 on technical privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) and 17 on the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—shows that no single safeguard withstands modern adversaries. The most resilient configurations layer differential privacy, federated learning and partial homomorphic encryption, maintaining < 2% accuracy loss on medical benchmarks while blocking current model-inversion attacks, though at notable computational cost. The legal literature reveals a coverage gap: GDPR protections are strong during data collection and preprocessing but weaken during training, inference and post-deployment reuse, when AI-specific risks peak. Article 22 offers only partial defence against model-inversion and prompt-leakage and learned embeddings or synthetic corpora often fall outside the regulation’s definition of personal data. Effective anonymity in the AI era, therefore, requires end-to-end PET adoption and regulatory updates that specifically address behavioural telemetry, embeddings and synthetic datasets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal of Social Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2025.138004
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anonymity in the Age of AI

Rezza Moieni, Parisasadat Shojaei, Nabi Zameni
1 citations
Open Journal of Social Sciences
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.48
article

Anonymity in the Age of AI

Rezza Moieni, Parisasadat Shojaei, Nabi Zameni
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is eroding traditional de-identification practices by enabling accurate re-identification of images, text and behavioural traces. A systematic review of 64 peer-reviewed studies published between 2013 and 2025—47 on technical privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) and 17 on the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—shows that no single safeguard withstands modern adversaries. The most resilient configurations layer differential privacy, federated learning and partial homomorphic encryption, maintaining < 2% accuracy loss on medical benchmarks while blocking current model-inversion attacks, though at notable computational cost. The legal literature reveals a coverage gap: GDPR protections are strong during data collection and preprocessing but weaken during training, inference and post-deployment reuse, when AI-specific risks peak. Article 22 offers only partial defence against model-inversion and prompt-leakage and learned embeddings or synthetic corpora often fall outside the regulation’s definition of personal data. Effective anonymity in the AI era, therefore, requires end-to-end PET adoption and regulatory updates that specifically address behavioural telemetry, embeddings and synthetic datasets.

Open Journal of Social SciencesVol. 13(08)
University of Divinity (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.