The Lived Experience of Pain Services: A Comparison of Service Users’ and Service Providers’ Experience of Irish Health Services

<b>Background:</b> A supportive healthcare experience that implements a biopsychosocial model of care can empower a person with chronic pain to make informed decisions and engage in self-management behaviours. Despite the positive influence of supportive healthcare, little is known about the presence of healthcare support in under-resourced chronic pain services. This idiographic study explores the lived experience of service users and providers participating in chronic pain services with a specific focus on autonomy support and self-management skills. <b>Methods:</b> Semistructured interviews were conducted on service users (<i>n</i> = 7) self-reporting a diagnosis of chronic pain (pain > 3 months) and service providers (<i>n</i> = 5), defined as healthcare professionals with > 3 years of experience in clinical healthcare settings managing pain conditions. All interviews took place online (mean 47 ± 11 min). Interview transcripts were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. <b>Results:</b> Analyses generated four themes: 'biomedical model leads care'; 'lost in a system'; 'I need support' and 'the essentials of self-management'. Both service users and providers described regular experiences of invalidation and biomedical approaches to pain management. Long waitlists, a lack of multidisciplinary services, short appointment times and a lack of educational resources all impacted the development of self-management skills in service users. <b>Conclusion:</b> Despite clinical guidelines recommending a biopsychosocial model of care, the biomedical model remains the dominant approach in chronic pain management, reflecting a persistent gap between evidence and practice. Service users and providers desire access to multidisciplinary services that support a biopsychosocial model of care. Healthcare professionals cannot deliver what service users expect due to macro-, meso- and microlevel factors. Future research is needed to explore practical solutions to deliver pain services that optimise the development of self-management skills where existing infrastructure and resources negatively impact service delivery. Suggested approaches include enhancing autonomy-supportive communication by healthcare providers and ensuring early access to high-quality educational materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pain Research and Management
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/4608906
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Lived Experience of Pain Services: A Comparison of Service Users’ and Service Providers’ Experience of Irish Health Services

Áine MacNamara, Kate Sheridan, Enda Francis Whyte, Siobhán O’Connor
1 citations
Pain Research and Management
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
article

The Lived Experience of Pain Services: A Comparison of Service Users’ and Service Providers’ Experience of Irish Health Services

Áine MacNamara, Kate Sheridan, Enda Francis Whyte, Siobhán O’Connor
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> A supportive healthcare experience that implements a biopsychosocial model of care can empower a person with chronic pain to make informed decisions and engage in self-management behaviours. Despite the positive influence of supportive healthcare, little is known about the presence of healthcare support in under-resourced chronic pain services. This idiographic study explores the lived experience of service users and providers participating in chronic pain services with a specific focus on autonomy support and self-management skills. <b>Methods:</b> Semistructured interviews were conducted on service users (<i>n</i> = 7) self-reporting a diagnosis of chronic pain (pain > 3 months) and service providers (<i>n</i> = 5), defined as healthcare professionals with > 3 years of experience in clinical healthcare settings managing pain conditions. All interviews took place online (mean 47 ± 11 min). Interview transcripts were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. <b>Results:</b> Analyses generated four themes: 'biomedical model leads care'; 'lost in a system'; 'I need support' and 'the essentials of self-management'. Both service users and providers described regular experiences of invalidation and biomedical approaches to pain management. Long waitlists, a lack of multidisciplinary services, short appointment times and a lack of educational resources all impacted the development of self-management skills in service users. <b>Conclusion:</b> Despite clinical guidelines recommending a biopsychosocial model of care, the biomedical model remains the dominant approach in chronic pain management, reflecting a persistent gap between evidence and practice. Service users and providers desire access to multidisciplinary services that support a biopsychosocial model of care. Healthcare professionals cannot deliver what service users expect due to macro-, meso- and microlevel factors. Future research is needed to explore practical solutions to deliver pain services that optimise the development of self-management skills where existing infrastructure and resources negatively impact service delivery. Suggested approaches include enhancing autonomy-supportive communication by healthcare providers and ensuring early access to high-quality educational materials.

Pain Research and ManagementVol. 2025(1)
Dublin City University (IE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.