LLMs can Perform Multi-Dimensional Analytic Writing Assessments: A Case Study of L2 Graduate-Level Academic English Writing

The paper explores the performance of LLMs in the context of multi-dimensional analytic writing assessments, i.e. their ability to provide both scores and comments based on multiple assessment criteria.Using a corpus of literature reviews written by L2 graduate students and assessed by human experts against 9 analytic criteria, we prompt several popular LLMs to perform the same task under various conditions.To evaluate the quality of feedback comments, we apply a novel feedback comment quality evaluation framework.This framework is interpretable, cost-efficient, scalable, and reproducible, compared to existing methods that rely on manual judgments.We find that LLMs can generate reasonably good and generally reliable multi-dimensional analytic assessments.We release our corpus and code 1 for reproducibility.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.423
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LLMs can Perform Multi-Dimensional Analytic Writing Assessments: A Case Study of L2 Graduate-Level Academic English Writing

Owen Rambow, Veronika Makarova, Jordan Kodner, Zhi Li et al.
1 citations
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
article

LLMs can Perform Multi-Dimensional Analytic Writing Assessments: A Case Study of L2 Graduate-Level Academic English Writing

Owen Rambow, Veronika Makarova, Jordan Kodner, Zhi Li, Zhengxiang Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The paper explores the performance of LLMs in the context of multi-dimensional analytic writing assessments, i.e. their ability to provide both scores and comments based on multiple assessment criteria.Using a corpus of literature reviews written by L2 graduate students and assessed by human experts against 9 analytic criteria, we prompt several popular LLMs to perform the same task under various conditions.To evaluate the quality of feedback comments, we apply a novel feedback comment quality evaluation framework.This framework is interpretable, cost-efficient, scalable, and reproducible, compared to existing methods that rely on manual judgments.We find that LLMs can generate reasonably good and generally reliable multi-dimensional analytic assessments.We release our corpus and code 1 for reproducibility.

Yale University, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania State University, Stony Brook University, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Advanced Research Projects Agency, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.