LLMs can Perform Multi-Dimensional Analytic Writing Assessments: A Case Study of L2 Graduate-Level Academic English Writing
The paper explores the performance of LLMs in the context of multi-dimensional analytic writing assessments, i.e. their ability to provide both scores and comments based on multiple assessment criteria.Using a corpus of literature reviews written by L2 graduate students and assessed by human experts against 9 analytic criteria, we prompt several popular LLMs to perform the same task under various conditions.To evaluate the quality of feedback comments, we apply a novel feedback comment quality evaluation framework.This framework is interpretable, cost-efficient, scalable, and reproducible, compared to existing methods that rely on manual judgments.We find that LLMs can generate reasonably good and generally reliable multi-dimensional analytic assessments.We release our corpus and code 1 for reproducibility.
Authors
- Owen Rambow
- Veronika Makarova (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1885-0989)
- Jordan Kodner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8632-9859)
- Zhi Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7804-5151)
- Zhengxiang Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3292-6043)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.423
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.48
Funders
- Yale University
- University of Pennsylvania
- Pennsylvania State University
- Stony Brook University
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada