Improving Chain-of-Thought Reasoning via Quasi-Symbolic Abstractions

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) represents a common strategy for reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) by decomposing complex tasks into intermediate inference steps.However, explanations generated via CoT are susceptible to content biases that negatively affect their robustness and faithfulness.To mitigate existing limitations, recent work has proposed the use of logical formalisms coupled with external symbolic solvers.However, fully symbolically formalised approaches introduce the bottleneck of requiring a complete translation from natural language to formal languages, a process that affects efficiency and flexibility.To achieve a trade-off, this paper investigates methods to disentangle content from logical reasoning without a complete formalisation.In particular, we present QuaSAR (for Quasi-Symbolic Abstract Reasoning), a variation of CoT that guides LLMs to operate at a higher level of abstraction via quasi-symbolic explanations.Our framework leverages the capability of LLMs to formalise only relevant variables and predicates, enabling the coexistence of symbolic elements with natural language.We show the impact of QuaSAR for in-context learning and for constructing demonstrations to improve the reasoning capabilities of smaller models.Our experiments show that quasi-symbolic abstractions can improve CoTbased methods by up to 8% accuracy, enhancing robustness and consistency on challenging adversarial variations on both natural language (i.e.MMLU-Redux) and symbolic reasoning tasks (i.e., GSM-Symbolic).