Un-considering Contextual Information: Assessing LLMs’ Understanding of Indexical Elements

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performances in tasks related to coreference resolution.However, previous studies mostly assessed LLM performance on coreference resolution with nouns and third person pronouns.This study evaluates LLM performance on coreference resolution with indexicals like I, you, here and tomorrow, which come with unique challenges due to their linguistic properties.We present the first study examining how LLMs interpret indexicals in English, releasing the English Indexical Dataset with 1600 multiple-choice questions.We evaluate pioneering LLMs, including GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and DeepSeek V3.Our results reveal that LLMs exhibit an impressive performance with some indexicals (I), while struggling with others (you, here, tomorrow), and that syntactic cues (e.g.quotation) contribute to LLM performance with some indexicals, while they reduce performance with others.Code and data are available at: https://github.com/ metehanoguzz/LLMs-Indexicals-English

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.1203
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Un-considering Contextual Information: Assessing LLMs’ Understanding of Indexical Elements

Duygu Nur Yaldiz, Yavuz Faruk Bakman, Metehan Oğuz
1 citations
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
article

Un-considering Contextual Information: Assessing LLMs’ Understanding of Indexical Elements

Duygu Nur Yaldiz, Yavuz Faruk Bakman, Metehan Oğuz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performances in tasks related to coreference resolution.However, previous studies mostly assessed LLM performance on coreference resolution with nouns and third person pronouns.This study evaluates LLM performance on coreference resolution with indexicals like I, you, here and tomorrow, which come with unique challenges due to their linguistic properties.We present the first study examining how LLMs interpret indexicals in English, releasing the English Indexical Dataset with 1600 multiple-choice questions.We evaluate pioneering LLMs, including GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini 1.5 Pro, and DeepSeek V3.Our results reveal that LLMs exhibit an impressive performance with some indexicals (I), while struggling with others (you, here, tomorrow), and that syntactic cues (e.g.quotation) contribute to LLM performance with some indexicals, while they reduce performance with others.Code and data are available at: https://github.com/ metehanoguzz/LLMs-Indexicals-English

University of Southern California (US), California Southern University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.