Lost in Transcription, Found in Distribution Shift: Demystifying Hallucination in Speech Foundation Models

Speech foundation models trained at a massive scale, both in terms of model and data size, result in robust systems capable of performing multiple speech tasks, including automatic speech recognition (ASR).These models transcend language and domain barriers, yet effectively measuring their performance remains a challenge.Traditional metrics like word error rate (WER) and character error rate (CER) are commonly used to evaluate ASR performance but often fail to reflect transcription quality in critical contexts, particularly when detecting fabricated outputs.This phenomenon, known as hallucination, is especially concerning in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, legal, and aviation, where errors can have severe consequences.In our work, we address this gap by investigating hallucination in ASR models.We examine how factors such as distribution shifts, model size, and model architecture influence the hallucination error rate (HER), a metric we introduce to quantify hallucinations.Our analysis of over 20 ASR models reveals three key insights: (1) High WERs can mask low hallucination rates, while low WERs may conceal dangerous hallucinations.(2) Synthetic noise, both adversarial and common perturbations like white noise, pitch shift, and time stretching, increase HER.(3) Distribution shift correlates strongly with HER ( = 0.91).Our findings highlight the importance of incorporating HER alongside traditional metrics like WER to better assess ASR model performance, particularly in high-stakes domains.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.1190
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lost in Transcription, Found in Distribution Shift: Demystifying Hallucination in Speech Foundation Models

Monojit Choudhury, Abdül Waheed, Rita Singh, Bhiksha Raj et al.
2 citations
Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
1.61
article

Lost in Transcription, Found in Distribution Shift: Demystifying Hallucination in Speech Foundation Models

Monojit Choudhury, Abdül Waheed, Rita Singh, Bhiksha Raj, Hanin Atwany
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Speech foundation models trained at a massive scale, both in terms of model and data size, result in robust systems capable of performing multiple speech tasks, including automatic speech recognition (ASR).These models transcend language and domain barriers, yet effectively measuring their performance remains a challenge.Traditional metrics like word error rate (WER) and character error rate (CER) are commonly used to evaluate ASR performance but often fail to reflect transcription quality in critical contexts, particularly when detecting fabricated outputs.This phenomenon, known as hallucination, is especially concerning in high-stakes domains such as healthcare, legal, and aviation, where errors can have severe consequences.In our work, we address this gap by investigating hallucination in ASR models.We examine how factors such as distribution shifts, model size, and model architecture influence the hallucination error rate (HER), a metric we introduce to quantify hallucinations.Our analysis of over 20 ASR models reveals three key insights: (1) High WERs can mask low hallucination rates, while low WERs may conceal dangerous hallucinations.(2) Synthetic noise, both adversarial and common perturbations like white noise, pitch shift, and time stretching, increase HER.(3) Distribution shift correlates strongly with HER ( = 0.91).Our findings highlight the importance of incorporating HER alongside traditional metrics like WER to better assess ASR model performance, particularly in high-stakes domains.

Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.