Understand the Implication: Learning to Think for Pragmatic Understanding

Pragmatics, the ability to infer meaning beyond literal interpretation, is crucial for social cognition and communication.While LLMs have been benchmarked for their pragmatic understanding, improving their performance remains underexplored.Existing methods rely on annotated labels but overlook the reasoning process humans naturally use to interpret implicit meaning.To bridge this gap, we introduce a novel pragmatic dataset ImpliedMean-ingPreference that includes explicit reasoning ('thoughts') for both correct and incorrect interpretations.Through preference-tuning and supervised fine-tuning, we demonstrate that thought-based learning significantly enhances LLMs' pragmatic understanding, improving accuracy by 11.12% across model families.We further discuss a transfer-learning study where we evaluate the performance of thought-based training for the other tasks of pragmatics (presupposition, deixis) that are not seen during the training time and observe an improvement of 16.10% compared to label trained models.Code and data are available in the repo

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.1218
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understand the Implication: Learning to Think for Pragmatic Understanding

Abhijit Mishra, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, Settaluri Lakshmi Sravanthi, Kishan Maharaj et al.
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Understand the Implication: Learning to Think for Pragmatic Understanding

Abhijit Mishra, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, Settaluri Lakshmi Sravanthi, Kishan Maharaj, Sravani Gunnu
article en

Abstract

Pragmatics, the ability to infer meaning beyond literal interpretation, is crucial for social cognition and communication.While LLMs have been benchmarked for their pragmatic understanding, improving their performance remains underexplored.Existing methods rely on annotated labels but overlook the reasoning process humans naturally use to interpret implicit meaning.To bridge this gap, we introduce a novel pragmatic dataset ImpliedMean-ingPreference that includes explicit reasoning ('thoughts') for both correct and incorrect interpretations.Through preference-tuning and supervised fine-tuning, we demonstrate that thought-based learning significantly enhances LLMs' pragmatic understanding, improving accuracy by 11.12% across model families.We further discuss a transfer-learning study where we evaluate the performance of thought-based training for the other tasks of pragmatics (presupposition, deixis) that are not seen during the training time and observe an improvement of 16.10% compared to label trained models.Code and data are available in the repo

Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.