MEXA: Multilingual Evaluation of English-Centric LLMs via Cross-Lingual Alignment

English-centric large language models (LLMs) often show strong multilingual capabilities.However, their multilingual performance remains unclear and is under-evaluated for many other languages.Most benchmarks for multilinguality focus on classic NLP tasks or cover a minimal number of languages.We introduce MEXA, a method for assessing the multilingual capabilities of pre-trained English-centric LLMs using parallel sentences, which are available for more languages than existing downstream tasks.MEXA leverages that Englishcentric LLMs use English as a pivot language in their intermediate layers.MEXA computes the alignment between English and non-English languages using parallel sentences to evaluate the transfer of language understanding from English to other languages.This alignment can be used to estimate model performance in different languages.We conduct controlled experiments using various parallel datasets (FLORES-200 and Bible), models (Llama family, Gemma family, Mistral, and OLMo), and established downstream tasks (Belebele, m-MMLU, and m-ARC).We explore different methods to compute embeddings in decoder-only models.Our results show that MEXA, in its default settings, achieves an average Pearson correlation of 0.90 between its predicted scores and actual task performance across languages.This suggests that MEXA is a reliable method for estimating the multilingual capabilities of English-centric LLMs, providing a clearer understanding of their multilingual potential and the inner workings of LLMs.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.1385
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MEXA: Multilingual Evaluation of English-Centric LLMs via Cross-Lingual Alignment

Jana Diesner, François Yvon, Amir Hossein Kargaran, Nafiseh Nikeghbal et al.
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

MEXA: Multilingual Evaluation of English-Centric LLMs via Cross-Lingual Alignment

Jana Diesner, François Yvon, Amir Hossein Kargaran, Nafiseh Nikeghbal, Hinrich Schuetze, Ali Modarressi
article en

Abstract

English-centric large language models (LLMs) often show strong multilingual capabilities.However, their multilingual performance remains unclear and is under-evaluated for many other languages.Most benchmarks for multilinguality focus on classic NLP tasks or cover a minimal number of languages.We introduce MEXA, a method for assessing the multilingual capabilities of pre-trained English-centric LLMs using parallel sentences, which are available for more languages than existing downstream tasks.MEXA leverages that Englishcentric LLMs use English as a pivot language in their intermediate layers.MEXA computes the alignment between English and non-English languages using parallel sentences to evaluate the transfer of language understanding from English to other languages.This alignment can be used to estimate model performance in different languages.We conduct controlled experiments using various parallel datasets (FLORES-200 and Bible), models (Llama family, Gemma family, Mistral, and OLMo), and established downstream tasks (Belebele, m-MMLU, and m-ARC).We explore different methods to compute embeddings in decoder-only models.Our results show that MEXA, in its default settings, achieves an average Pearson correlation of 0.90 between its predicted scores and actual task performance across languages.This suggests that MEXA is a reliable method for estimating the multilingual capabilities of English-centric LLMs, providing a clearer understanding of their multilingual potential and the inner workings of LLMs.

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.