What Language Do Non-English-Centric Large Language Models Think in?

In this study, we investigate whether non-English-centric large language models, 'think' in their specialized language.Specifically, we analyze how intermediate layer representations, when projected into the vocabulary space, favor certain languages during generation-termed as latent languages.We categorize non-Englishcentric models into two groups: CPMs, which are English-centric models with continued pretraining on their specialized language, and BLMs, which are pre-trained on a balanced mix of multiple languages from scratch.Our findings reveal that while English-centric models rely exclusively on English as their latent language, non-English-centric models activate multiple latent languages, dynamically selecting the most similar one based on both the source and target languages.This also influences responses to culture difference questions, reducing English-centric biases in non-English models.This study deepens our understanding of language representation in non-Englishcentric LLMs, shedding light on the intricate dynamics of multilingual processing at the representational level.Our code is publicly available.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.1350
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Language Do Non-English-Centric Large Language Models Think in?

Yugo Murawaki, Junfeng Jiang, Sadao Kurohashi, Zhen Wan et al.
1 citations
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
article

What Language Do Non-English-Centric Large Language Models Think in?

Yugo Murawaki, Junfeng Jiang, Sadao Kurohashi, Zhen Wan, Fei Cheng, Qianying Liu, Chenhui Chu, Chengzhi Zhong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this study, we investigate whether non-English-centric large language models, 'think' in their specialized language.Specifically, we analyze how intermediate layer representations, when projected into the vocabulary space, favor certain languages during generation-termed as latent languages.We categorize non-Englishcentric models into two groups: CPMs, which are English-centric models with continued pretraining on their specialized language, and BLMs, which are pre-trained on a balanced mix of multiple languages from scratch.Our findings reveal that while English-centric models rely exclusively on English as their latent language, non-English-centric models activate multiple latent languages, dynamically selecting the most similar one based on both the source and target languages.This also influences responses to culture difference questions, reducing English-centric biases in non-English models.This study deepens our understanding of language representation in non-Englishcentric LLMs, shedding light on the intricate dynamics of multilingual processing at the representational level.Our code is publicly available.

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What Language Do Non-English-Centric Large Language Models Think in? — Yugo Murawaki, Junfeng Jiang, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS