MDBench: A Synthetic Multi-Document Reasoning Benchmark Generated with Knowledge Guidance
Natural language processing evaluation has made significant progress, largely driven by the proliferation of powerful large language models (LLMs).New evaluation benchmarks are of increasing priority as the reasoning capabilities of LLMs are expanding at a rapid pace.In particular, while multi-document (MD) reasoning is an area of extreme relevance given LLM capabilities in handling longer-context inputs, few benchmarks exist to rigorously examine model behavior in this setting.Moreover, the multidocument setting is historically challenging for benchmark creation due to the expensive cost of annotating long inputs.In this work, we introduce MDBENCH, a new dataset for evaluating LLMs on the task of multi-document reasoning.Notably, MD-BENCH is created through a novel synthetic generation process, allowing us to controllably and efficiently generate challenging document sets and the corresponding question-answer (QA) examples.Our novel technique operates on condensed structured seed knowledge, modifying it through LLM-assisted edits to induce MD-specific reasoning challenges.We then convert this structured knowledge into a natural text surface form, generating a document set and corresponding QA example.We analyze the behavior of frontier LLMs and prompting techniques, finding that MDBENCH poses significant challenges for all methods, even with relatively short document sets.We also see our knowledge-guided generation technique (1) allows us to readily perform targeted analysis of MD-specific reasoning capabilities and (2) can be adapted quickly to account for new challenges and future modeling improvements.
Authors
- Joseph J. Peper
- Ali Payani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4054-2958)
- Lu Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6345-3873)
- W. QIU (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7373-7255)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-acl.1312
- Primary Topic
- Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Cisco Systems
- Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction