Superfluous Instruction: Vulnerabilities Stemming from Task-Specific Superficial Expressions in Instruction Templates

Large language models (LLMs) achieve high performance through instruction-tuning, which involves learning various tasks using instruction templates.However, these templates often contain task-specific expressions, which are words that frequently appear in certain contexts but do not always convey the actual meaning of that context, even if they seem closely related to the target task.Biases inherent in such instruction templates may be learned by LLMs during training, potentially degrading performance when the models encounter superficial expressions.In this study, we propose a method that incorporates additional instructions to FLAN templates, without altering the base instruction to produce "superfluous instructions".This allows us to investigate the vulnerabilities of LLMs caused by overfitting to task-specific expressions embedded in instruction templates.The experimental results revealed that the inclusion of superficial words strongly related to each task in the instruction text can alter the output, regardless of the intended meaning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.knowllm-1.12
Primary Topic
Security and Verification in Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Superfluous Instruction: Vulnerabilities Stemming from Task-Specific Superficial Expressions in Instruction Templates

Hidetaka Kamigaito, Justin Vasselli, Yusuke Sakai, Toma Suzuki et al.
Security and Verification in Computing
article

Superfluous Instruction: Vulnerabilities Stemming from Task-Specific Superficial Expressions in Instruction Templates

Hidetaka Kamigaito, Justin Vasselli, Yusuke Sakai, Toma Suzuki, Taro Watanabe
article en

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) achieve high performance through instruction-tuning, which involves learning various tasks using instruction templates.However, these templates often contain task-specific expressions, which are words that frequently appear in certain contexts but do not always convey the actual meaning of that context, even if they seem closely related to the target task.Biases inherent in such instruction templates may be learned by LLMs during training, potentially degrading performance when the models encounter superficial expressions.In this study, we propose a method that incorporates additional instructions to FLAN templates, without altering the base instruction to produce "superfluous instructions".This allows us to investigate the vulnerabilities of LLMs caused by overfitting to task-specific expressions embedded in instruction templates.The experimental results revealed that the inclusion of superficial words strongly related to each task in the instruction text can alter the output, regardless of the intended meaning.

Nara Institute of Science and Technology (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Security and Verification in Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Superfluous Instruction: Vulnerabilities Stemming from Task-Specific Superficial Expressions in Instruction Templates — Hidetaka Kamigaito, Justin Vasselli, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS