Strengths and Limitations of Word-Based Task Explainability in Vision Language Models: a Case Study on Biological Sex Biases in the Medical Domain

Vision-language models (VLMs) can achieve high accuracy in medical applications but can retain demographic biases from training data.While multiple works have identified the presence of these biases in many VLMs, it remains unclear how strong their impact at the inference level is.In this work, we study how well a task-level explainability method based on linear combinations of words can detect multiple types of biases, with a focus on medical image classification.By manipulating the training datasets with demographic and nondemographic biases, we show how the adopted approach can detect explicitly encoded biases but fails with implicitly encoded ones, particularly biological sex.Our results suggest that such a failure likely stems from misalignment between sex-describing features in image versus text modalities.Our findings highlight limitations in the evaluated explainability method for detecting implicit biases in medical VLMs.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.gebnlp-1.12
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strengths and Limitations of Word-Based Task Explainability in Vision Language Models: a Case Study on Biological Sex Biases in the Medical Domain

Lia Orfei, Valentin Comte, Mario Ceresa, Lorenzo Bertolini et al.
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

Strengths and Limitations of Word-Based Task Explainability in Vision Language Models: a Case Study on Biological Sex Biases in the Medical Domain

Lia Orfei, Valentin Comte, Mario Ceresa, Lorenzo Bertolini, Victoria Ruiz-Serra
article en

Abstract

Vision-language models (VLMs) can achieve high accuracy in medical applications but can retain demographic biases from training data.While multiple works have identified the presence of these biases in many VLMs, it remains unclear how strong their impact at the inference level is.In this work, we study how well a task-level explainability method based on linear combinations of words can detect multiple types of biases, with a focus on medical image classification.By manipulating the training datasets with demographic and nondemographic biases, we show how the adopted approach can detect explicitly encoded biases but fails with implicitly encoded ones, particularly biological sex.Our results suggest that such a failure likely stems from misalignment between sex-describing features in image versus text modalities.Our findings highlight limitations in the evaluated explainability method for detecting implicit biases in medical VLMs.

European Commission, Joint Research Centre
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.