SciBERT Meets Contrastive Learning: A Solution for Scientific Hallucination Detection

Large language models are increasingly used to synthesize scientific literature, yet they remain prone to hallucination -claims that are linguistically fluent but lack support in the cited sources.We tackle hallucination detection in the SCIHAL 2025 challenge by augmenting SCIBERT with Triplet and InfoNCE contrastive objectives in addition to cross-entropy classification.The system achieves validation macro-F 1 scores of 0.6260.004on the coarsegrained hallucination detection task (Sub-task 1) and 0.632 0.012 on the fine-grained detection task (Sub-task 2), exceeding a plain SCIB-ERT baseline by more than three points.The official blind test set scores reach macro-F 1 scores of 0.51 and 0.43 for Sub-tasks 1 and 2, respectively, securing fifth place in both leaderboards.Confusion matrix analysis shows that contrastive learning markedly improves majority classes, whereas sparse categories, especially Missing Information, remain challenging despite aggressive attempts to mitigate class imbalance.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.sdp-1.32
Primary Topic
Mental Health Research Topics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SciBERT Meets Contrastive Learning: A Solution for Scientific Hallucination Detection

Ana Sabina Uban, Crivoi Carla
Mental Health Research Topics
article

SciBERT Meets Contrastive Learning: A Solution for Scientific Hallucination Detection

Ana Sabina Uban, Crivoi Carla
article en

Abstract

Large language models are increasingly used to synthesize scientific literature, yet they remain prone to hallucination -claims that are linguistically fluent but lack support in the cited sources.We tackle hallucination detection in the SCIHAL 2025 challenge by augmenting SCIBERT with Triplet and InfoNCE contrastive objectives in addition to cross-entropy classification.The system achieves validation macro-F 1 scores of 0.6260.004on the coarsegrained hallucination detection task (Sub-task 1) and 0.632 0.012 on the fine-grained detection task (Sub-task 2), exceeding a plain SCIB-ERT baseline by more than three points.The official blind test set scores reach macro-F 1 scores of 0.51 and 0.43 for Sub-tasks 1 and 2, respectively, securing fifth place in both leaderboards.Confusion matrix analysis shows that contrastive learning markedly improves majority classes, whereas sparse categories, especially Missing Information, remain challenging despite aggressive attempts to mitigate class imbalance.

Health Resources in Action, Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Mental Health Research Topics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

SciBERT Meets Contrastive Learning: A Solution for Scientific Hallucination Detection — Ana Sabina Uban, Crivoi Carla · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS