Are You Sure You’re Positive? Consolidating Chain-of-Thought Agents with Uncertainty Quantification for Aspect-Category Sentiment Analysis

Aspect-category sentiment analysis provides granular insights by identifying specific themes within product reviews that are associated with particular opinions.Supervised learning approaches dominate the field.However, data is scarce and expensive to annotate for new domains.We argue that leveraging large language models in a zero-shot setting is beneficial where the time and resources required for dataset annotation are limited.Furthermore, annotation bias may lead to strong results using supervised methods but transfer poorly to new domains in contexts that lack annotations and demand reproducibility.In our work, we propose novel techniques that combine multiple chain-of-thought agents by leveraging large language models' token-level uncertainty scores.We experiment with the 3B and 70B+ parameter size variants of Llama and Qwen models, demonstrating how these approaches can fulfil practical needs and opening a discussion on how to gauge accuracy in label-scarce conditions.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.realm-1.22
Primary Topic
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are You Sure You’re Positive? Consolidating Chain-of-Thought Agents with Uncertainty Quantification for Aspect-Category Sentiment Analysis

Matthew Shardlow, P. G. Appleby, Filippos Ventirozos
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
article

Are You Sure You’re Positive? Consolidating Chain-of-Thought Agents with Uncertainty Quantification for Aspect-Category Sentiment Analysis

Matthew Shardlow, P. G. Appleby, Filippos Ventirozos
article en

Abstract

Aspect-category sentiment analysis provides granular insights by identifying specific themes within product reviews that are associated with particular opinions.Supervised learning approaches dominate the field.However, data is scarce and expensive to annotate for new domains.We argue that leveraging large language models in a zero-shot setting is beneficial where the time and resources required for dataset annotation are limited.Furthermore, annotation bias may lead to strong results using supervised methods but transfer poorly to new domains in contexts that lack annotations and demand reproducibility.In our work, we propose novel techniques that combine multiple chain-of-thought agents by leveraging large language models' token-level uncertainty scores.We experiment with the 3B and 70B+ parameter size variants of Llama and Qwen models, demonstrating how these approaches can fulfil practical needs and opening a discussion on how to gauge accuracy in label-scarce conditions.

Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.