LLMSR@XLLM25: Integrating Reasoning Prompt Strategies with Structural Prompt Formats for Enhanced Logical Inference

This paper illustrates our team system approach in XLLM-ACL 2025 Task-III: LLM for Structural Reasoning (LLM-SR), aiming to solve both Task: Question parsing and CoT parsing.The process of extracting statements and evidence is similar to Discourse Parsing.Correct extraction of statements or evidence from the COT is crucial at the outset.Next, the pairwise relationship between a specific statement and its corresponding evidence is assessed (a statement should be followed by its related evidence from the CoT).Both semantic and lexical similarity are used to evaluate the accuracy of statements and evidence predictions.Finally, once a statement-evidence pair is correctly extracted, it is evaluated to determine whether the evidence can logically deduce the statement.To tackle Question Parsing and CoT Parsing, we implement and investigate various solutions, including (1) applying different structural prompt formats like JSON, Markdown, or XML.(2) utilising various prompt techniques: Few-shot, Chain of thought, and Multi-hop prompting.(3) Taking advantage of Natural Language Inference (NLI) model for the Statement Verification step.Our best official result is a 243.047 mean score for test phases A and B, and finally, we rank 7th on the final leaderboard.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.xllm-1.27
Primary Topic
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LLMSR@XLLM25: Integrating Reasoning Prompt Strategies with Structural Prompt Formats for Enhanced Logical Inference

Thìn Đặng Văn, Le Thai Tai
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
article

LLMSR@XLLM25: Integrating Reasoning Prompt Strategies with Structural Prompt Formats for Enhanced Logical Inference

Thìn Đặng Văn, Le Thai Tai
article en

Abstract

This paper illustrates our team system approach in XLLM-ACL 2025 Task-III: LLM for Structural Reasoning (LLM-SR), aiming to solve both Task: Question parsing and CoT parsing.The process of extracting statements and evidence is similar to Discourse Parsing.Correct extraction of statements or evidence from the COT is crucial at the outset.Next, the pairwise relationship between a specific statement and its corresponding evidence is assessed (a statement should be followed by its related evidence from the CoT).Both semantic and lexical similarity are used to evaluate the accuracy of statements and evidence predictions.Finally, once a statement-evidence pair is correctly extracted, it is evaluated to determine whether the evidence can logically deduce the statement.To tackle Question Parsing and CoT Parsing, we implement and investigate various solutions, including (1) applying different structural prompt formats like JSON, Markdown, or XML.(2) utilising various prompt techniques: Few-shot, Chain of thought, and Multi-hop prompting.(3) Taking advantage of Natural Language Inference (NLI) model for the Statement Verification step.Our best official result is a 243.047 mean score for test phases A and B, and finally, we rank 7th on the final leaderboard.

Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

LLMSR@XLLM25: Integrating Reasoning Prompt Strategies with Structural Prompt Formats for Enhanced Logical Inference — Thìn Đặng Văn, Le Thai Tai · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS