Do Large Language Models Learn Human-Like Strategic Preferences?

In this paper, we evaluate whether LLMs learn to make human-like preference judgements in strategic scenarios as compared with known empirical results.Solar and Mistral are shown to exhibit stable value-based preference consistent with humans and exhibit human-like preference for cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma (including stake-size effect) and traveler's dilemma (including penalty-size effect).We establish a relationship between model size, value-based preference, and superficiality.Finally, results here show that models tending to be less brittle have relied on sliding window attention suggesting a potential link.Additionally, we contribute a novel method for constructing preference relations from arbitrary LLMs and support for a hypothesis regarding human behavior in the traveler's dilemma.