On the influence of women in the upper echelon

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of increased representation of women executives on Boards of Directors (Board) and top management teams (TMT) on firms’ financial and non-financial performance in the USA. Design/methodology/approach This paper used US firms from the Morningstar Advisor workstation to test the hypotheses using ordinary least squares regression, examining linear, quadratic and interactive effects of variables of interest. Findings This analysis reveals that a greater number of women on executive teams (Board and/or TMT) is associated with reduced governance and social-related risks, as reflected in improved ESG scores. However, this paper also observed a corresponding decrease in financial performance. Research limitations/implications Researchers using Upper Echelons Theory or Critical Mass Theory should develop models that explain the effects of diversity on firm outcomes and explore the antecedents and boundary conditions that might strengthen or weaken these effects. Practical implications The results of this study imply the total number, not the relative percentage, of women executives is more important for influencing firm performance. The optimal number of women (and other minorities) might vary depending on the specific outcome of interest. Decisions regarding all forms of diversity, including gender, should be strategically aligned with the outcomes firms seek to impact. For example, firms seeking to improve ESG scores should prioritize increasing the number of women in leadership roles. Social implications While efforts to address the lack of executive diversity are commendable and hold the potential to improve firm decision-making and outcomes, the potential negative implications, such as decreased financial performance, should also be carefully considered and mitigated. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to explore the interactive effects of women’s representation on both the Board and TMT simultaneously.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of organizational analysis
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-10-2024-4906
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the influence of women in the upper echelon

K. Stephen Haggard, Jason D. DeBode, Dana L. Haggard, Rebecca Grimm
1 citations
International journal of organizational analysis
Gender Diversity and Inequality
3.87
article

On the influence of women in the upper echelon

K. Stephen Haggard, Jason D. DeBode, Dana L. Haggard, Rebecca Grimm
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of increased representation of women executives on Boards of Directors (Board) and top management teams (TMT) on firms’ financial and non-financial performance in the USA. Design/methodology/approach This paper used US firms from the Morningstar Advisor workstation to test the hypotheses using ordinary least squares regression, examining linear, quadratic and interactive effects of variables of interest. Findings This analysis reveals that a greater number of women on executive teams (Board and/or TMT) is associated with reduced governance and social-related risks, as reflected in improved ESG scores. However, this paper also observed a corresponding decrease in financial performance. Research limitations/implications Researchers using Upper Echelons Theory or Critical Mass Theory should develop models that explain the effects of diversity on firm outcomes and explore the antecedents and boundary conditions that might strengthen or weaken these effects. Practical implications The results of this study imply the total number, not the relative percentage, of women executives is more important for influencing firm performance. The optimal number of women (and other minorities) might vary depending on the specific outcome of interest. Decisions regarding all forms of diversity, including gender, should be strategically aligned with the outcomes firms seek to impact. For example, firms seeking to improve ESG scores should prioritize increasing the number of women in leadership roles. Social implications While efforts to address the lack of executive diversity are commendable and hold the potential to improve firm decision-making and outcomes, the potential negative implications, such as decreased financial performance, should also be carefully considered and mitigated. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to explore the interactive effects of women’s representation on both the Board and TMT simultaneously.

International journal of organizational analysisVol. 34(3)
Missouri State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
3.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.