Polarization in the COVID‐19 pandemic: The impact of vaccination status and conspiracy theories

The COVID-19 pandemic gave rise to a new social identity through vaccination status and yielded substantial polarization between vaccinated and unvaccinated people. Across two studies conducted via online platform Prolific, we examined the polarization between vaccinated and unvaccinated people in the United States. Study 1 (N = 646) revealed that vaccinated people were more polarized toward unvaccinated people than vice versa across a range of polarization indicators. Conspiracy beliefs moderated these effects. Higher conspiracy beliefs predicted increased polarization among unvaccinated people; however, lower conspiracy beliefs predicted increased polarization among vaccinated people. Study 2 (N = 503) focused specifically on feelings of hate and revealed that vaccinated and unvaccinated people were polarized toward different target groups. While vaccinated people expressed more hate toward unvaccinated people than vice versa, unvaccinated people expressed more hate toward the government. Additional analyses indicated that besides public health concerns, feelings of hate also predicted vaccinated people's support for excluding unvaccinated people from public places. These findings offer novel insight into the complex dynamics that help explain the polarization that occurred among both vaccinated and unvaccinated people.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15408
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polarization in the COVID‐19 pandemic: The impact of vaccination status and conspiracy theories

Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Sefa Ergün, John Butler, Lisa Willemsen et al.
1 citations
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
article

Polarization in the COVID‐19 pandemic: The impact of vaccination status and conspiracy theories

Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Sefa Ergün, John Butler, Lisa Willemsen, Chiara Serafini
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic gave rise to a new social identity through vaccination status and yielded substantial polarization between vaccinated and unvaccinated people. Across two studies conducted via online platform Prolific, we examined the polarization between vaccinated and unvaccinated people in the United States. Study 1 (N = 646) revealed that vaccinated people were more polarized toward unvaccinated people than vice versa across a range of polarization indicators. Conspiracy beliefs moderated these effects. Higher conspiracy beliefs predicted increased polarization among unvaccinated people; however, lower conspiracy beliefs predicted increased polarization among vaccinated people. Study 2 (N = 503) focused specifically on feelings of hate and revealed that vaccinated and unvaccinated people were polarized toward different target groups. While vaccinated people expressed more hate toward unvaccinated people than vice versa, unvaccinated people expressed more hate toward the government. Additional analyses indicated that besides public health concerns, feelings of hate also predicted vaccinated people's support for excluding unvaccinated people from public places. These findings offer novel insight into the complex dynamics that help explain the polarization that occurred among both vaccinated and unvaccinated people.

Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesVol. 1551(1)
University of Groningen (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NL), Netherlands Leprosy Relief (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Polarization in the COVID‐19 pandemic: The impact of vaccination status and conspiracy theories — Jan‐Willem van Prooijen, Sefa Ergün, et al. · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS