The Value of the Great Victory: Emotional Optics

The article is devoted to the study of the role of emotions in the formation of historical memory and axiological guidelines related to Victory in the Great Patriotic War in the post-truth era. The authors analyze how emotional narratives become a tool for constructing collective identity and resist the revision of historical facts. In the context of the crisis of global projects of the future, the past, and especially the historical events of 1941–1945, are turning into a key element of self-determination that unites Russian society through the sacralization of heroism and sacrifice. The main focus is on the conflict between official and alternative interpretations of history, manifested in the ‘‘memorial wars’’. Examples include disputes about the role of the USSR in defeating Nazism, attempts to equalize the USSR and the Third Reich, as well as resolutions of European parliamentary institutions reviewing the causes of World War II. The authors emphasize that these conflicts do not reflect a clash of facts, but a struggle of values rooted in emotions — pride, sorrow. Through the prism of emotional axiology and epistemology, the article reveals the role of rituals (parades, the Immortal Regiment), media and art in maintaining an affective connection with the past. These practices, reinforced by digital technologies, form an ‘‘emotional credibility’’ where experience prevails over rational assessment. The philosophical basis of the work is based on the ideas of M. Scheler, P. Nora and G. Deleuze, demonstrating how emotions construct value realities and become mediators between the past and the present. In the context of post-truth, Victory is interpreted as a ‘‘living memory’’ that resists the erosion of historical truth. The authors argue that emotional optics allows us to overcome the binary of rational and sensual, revealing the dynamics of memory as a hybrid process where official narratives, personal stories and collective myths interact. Thus, the Great Victory remains not only a historical event, but also an ethical landmark that unites society in an era of information instability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Patria
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17323/patria.2025.26788
Primary Topic
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Value of the Great Victory: Emotional Optics

Регина Пеннер, Denis S. Artamonov
1 links
Patria
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
article

The Value of the Great Victory: Emotional Optics

Регина Пеннер, Denis S. Artamonov
article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the role of emotions in the formation of historical memory and axiological guidelines related to Victory in the Great Patriotic War in the post-truth era. The authors analyze how emotional narratives become a tool for constructing collective identity and resist the revision of historical facts. In the context of the crisis of global projects of the future, the past, and especially the historical events of 1941–1945, are turning into a key element of self-determination that unites Russian society through the sacralization of heroism and sacrifice. The main focus is on the conflict between official and alternative interpretations of history, manifested in the ‘‘memorial wars’’. Examples include disputes about the role of the USSR in defeating Nazism, attempts to equalize the USSR and the Third Reich, as well as resolutions of European parliamentary institutions reviewing the causes of World War II. The authors emphasize that these conflicts do not reflect a clash of facts, but a struggle of values rooted in emotions — pride, sorrow. Through the prism of emotional axiology and epistemology, the article reveals the role of rituals (parades, the Immortal Regiment), media and art in maintaining an affective connection with the past. These practices, reinforced by digital technologies, form an ‘‘emotional credibility’’ where experience prevails over rational assessment. The philosophical basis of the work is based on the ideas of M. Scheler, P. Nora and G. Deleuze, demonstrating how emotions construct value realities and become mediators between the past and the present. In the context of post-truth, Victory is interpreted as a ‘‘living memory’’ that resists the erosion of historical truth. The authors argue that emotional optics allows us to overcome the binary of rational and sensual, revealing the dynamics of memory as a hybrid process where official narratives, personal stories and collective myths interact. Thus, the Great Victory remains not only a historical event, but also an ethical landmark that unites society in an era of information instability.

PatriaVol. 2(2)
Weatherford College (US)
Univerzita Karlova v Praze
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.