Partnership factors enabling co-planning of sustainable rural health models

Background Strong partnerships are the cornerstone for effectively co-planning primary healthcare models that meet community needs, however, there are few examples specifically for rural areas where smaller health services cover a dispersed population and wide geography with limited resources (thin markets). This study aimed to explore the partnership factors enabling the co-planning of sustainable rural health models in thin markets. Methods A qualitative study drawing upon in-depth focus groups with eight partnership members covering a combined estimated resident population of 24,620 people across three local government areas with small rural towns ( Results The overarching theme was that the partnership was valued and should continue. Four sub-themes included: the importance of the skilled and independent project lead to coordinate co-planning, the leadership and commitment of rural health service executives, strength and fragility of the project in the face of limited resources and staffing changes, and the importance of trust and relationships. Conclusions The research suggested that partnerships for co-planning of sustainable rural health models in rural thin markets are important. Independent and skilled leadership can assist small rural health services to engage with co-planning. This context also relies on committed rural health service executives who pay attention to building relationships and trust. Partnerships within this context are likely to be dynamic and require executives to spend time together to understand the range of problems and potential solutions as conditions change. With attention to these partnership factors, work on sustainable rural health models can be maintained.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Primary Health
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/py25015
Primary Topic
Global Health Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partnership factors enabling co-planning of sustainable rural health models

Pam Harvey, Mandy Hutchinson, Nerida Hyett, Catherine D. Lees et al.
1 links
Australian Journal of Primary Health
Global Health Workforce Issues
article

Partnership factors enabling co-planning of sustainable rural health models

Pam Harvey, Mandy Hutchinson, Nerida Hyett, Catherine D. Lees, Belinda O’Sullivan, Donna Doyle, Trevor Adem, Dallas Coghill
article en

Abstract

Background Strong partnerships are the cornerstone for effectively co-planning primary healthcare models that meet community needs, however, there are few examples specifically for rural areas where smaller health services cover a dispersed population and wide geography with limited resources (thin markets). This study aimed to explore the partnership factors enabling the co-planning of sustainable rural health models in thin markets. Methods A qualitative study drawing upon in-depth focus groups with eight partnership members covering a combined estimated resident population of 24,620 people across three local government areas with small rural towns ( Results The overarching theme was that the partnership was valued and should continue. Four sub-themes included: the importance of the skilled and independent project lead to coordinate co-planning, the leadership and commitment of rural health service executives, strength and fragility of the project in the face of limited resources and staffing changes, and the importance of trust and relationships. Conclusions The research suggested that partnerships for co-planning of sustainable rural health models in rural thin markets are important. Independent and skilled leadership can assist small rural health services to engage with co-planning. This context also relies on committed rural health service executives who pay attention to building relationships and trust. Partnerships within this context are likely to be dynamic and require executives to spend time together to understand the range of problems and potential solutions as conditions change. With attention to these partnership factors, work on sustainable rural health models can be maintained.

Australian Journal of Primary HealthVol. 31(4)
Northern Health (AU), La Trobe University (AU), QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU), United Medical Research Institute (US), WA Country Health Service (AU), Monash Health (AU), Aboriginal Health Council of South Australia (AU), Short and Associates (United States) (US), Community Health Center (US), Bendigo Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Global Health Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.