Hydropower and environmental flow management: System-level trade-offs at Glen Canyon Dam

The research focuses on the Colorado River Basin, specifically examining the Glen Canyon Dam (GCD) and its influence on surrounding aquatic ecosystems. This area is crucial due to its role in hydropower production and its impact on downstream environments, including the Grand Canyon National Park. This study explores the integration of environmental factors into hydro dispatch modeling at GCD to tackle ecological challenges posed by the invasive smallmouth bass (SMB). Utilizing the GTMax SL and SERM models, the research assesses the effects of SMB control experiments on hydropower generation, economic value, and grid stability. The study examines the financial and economic impacts of bypass flows designed to release colder water to prevent SMB spawning, which can significantly reduce hydropower output and increase costs. The research identifies that declining reservoir levels and rising water temperatures in Lake Powell have facilitated SMB spawning, posing a threat to native fish populations like the endangered humpback chub. The findings highlight the importance of adaptive management strategies to balance ecological preservation with hydropower generation amid long-term weather-related challenges. The study underscores the need for comprehensive assessments of flow options to prevent SMB establishment below GCD, considering the broader implications for sediment dynamics and ecological interactions. • GTMax SL and SERM models evaluate the impacts on energy, ecology, economy and finance. • Models optimize operation at GCD to balance ecological benefits and economic costs. • Bypass flows at GCD cut hydropower by up to 806 GWh, costing as much as $193 million. • Timing bypass during low-demand and low-prices greatly reduces economic impact. • NW_CM_LCR is costly but preferred alternative; the only policy ensuring SMB control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102624
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydropower and environmental flow management: System-level trade-offs at Glen Canyon Dam

Jerry Wilhite, Quentin Ploussard, Matija Pavičević, T. Veselka et al.
1 citations
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
article

Hydropower and environmental flow management: System-level trade-offs at Glen Canyon Dam

Jerry Wilhite, Quentin Ploussard, Matija Pavičević, T. Veselka, Walter Henriquez, M. Usis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The research focuses on the Colorado River Basin, specifically examining the Glen Canyon Dam (GCD) and its influence on surrounding aquatic ecosystems. This area is crucial due to its role in hydropower production and its impact on downstream environments, including the Grand Canyon National Park. This study explores the integration of environmental factors into hydro dispatch modeling at GCD to tackle ecological challenges posed by the invasive smallmouth bass (SMB). Utilizing the GTMax SL and SERM models, the research assesses the effects of SMB control experiments on hydropower generation, economic value, and grid stability. The study examines the financial and economic impacts of bypass flows designed to release colder water to prevent SMB spawning, which can significantly reduce hydropower output and increase costs. The research identifies that declining reservoir levels and rising water temperatures in Lake Powell have facilitated SMB spawning, posing a threat to native fish populations like the endangered humpback chub. The findings highlight the importance of adaptive management strategies to balance ecological preservation with hydropower generation amid long-term weather-related challenges. The study underscores the need for comprehensive assessments of flow options to prevent SMB establishment below GCD, considering the broader implications for sediment dynamics and ecological interactions. • GTMax SL and SERM models evaluate the impacts on energy, ecology, economy and finance. • Models optimize operation at GCD to balance ecological benefits and economic costs. • Bypass flows at GCD cut hydropower by up to 806 GWh, costing as much as $193 million. • Timing bypass during low-demand and low-prices greatly reduces economic impact. • NW_CM_LCR is costly but preferred alternative; the only policy ensuring SMB control.

Journal of Hydrology Regional StudiesVol. 61
Argonne National Laboratory (US), Wind Power Engineering (Japan) (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.