Process Optimization and Characterization of L-PBF 3.3% Si Electrical Steel via Machine Learning and XAI

In this study, electrical steel was additively manufactured using the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) process with 3.3% Si powder. The effects of varying laser power, scanning speed, and Y-axis scanning angle on the microstructure, density, surface roughness, and hardness were investigated. Machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques were employed to model and optimize processing conditions to achieve desirable density, surface roughness, and hardness, and the results were compared with those of commercial electrical steel. Microstructural observations revealed melt pools with cellular structures, dendrites, and porosity along the solidification heat flow direction. As the number of layers increased, primary pores formed and extended continuously along the build direction (BD). Stable values of porosity, surface roughness, and hardness were achieved when the laser power exceeded 250W and the scan speed ranged from 300 to 1000 mm/s. Increasing the Y-axis scanning angle led to a stepped layer structure due to variations in deposition thickness, which negatively affected surface roughness and porosity, although the impact on hardness was minimal—indicating the feasibility of thin-layer fabrication. Optimization using machine learning and XAI reduced porosity to 5.49%, surface roughness to 4.6 µm, and increased hardness to 305.9 HV. The predicted and experimental values showed deviations within 5%, validating the effectiveness of the machine learning approach. By prioritizing high density and low roughness, the optimal processing conditions were suggested to be 260 W, 30<sup>o</sup>, and 700 mm/s. Compared with commercial electrical steel, the additively manufactured samples showed a 2% lower density, fourfold higher roughness, and 10% higher hardness, suggesting that with improved roughness control, L-PBF-based additive manufacturing could become a viable production route for electrical steel.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Metals and Materials
Published
2025-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3365/kjmm.2025.63.8.568
Primary Topic
Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Process Optimization and Characterization of L-PBF 3.3% Si Electrical Steel via Machine Learning and XAI

Se Min Park, HyeonAh Kim
Korean Journal of Metals and Materials
Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
article

Process Optimization and Characterization of L-PBF 3.3% Si Electrical Steel via Machine Learning and XAI

Se Min Park, HyeonAh Kim
article en

Abstract

In this study, electrical steel was additively manufactured using the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) process with 3.3% Si powder. The effects of varying laser power, scanning speed, and Y-axis scanning angle on the microstructure, density, surface roughness, and hardness were investigated. Machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques were employed to model and optimize processing conditions to achieve desirable density, surface roughness, and hardness, and the results were compared with those of commercial electrical steel. Microstructural observations revealed melt pools with cellular structures, dendrites, and porosity along the solidification heat flow direction. As the number of layers increased, primary pores formed and extended continuously along the build direction (BD). Stable values of porosity, surface roughness, and hardness were achieved when the laser power exceeded 250W and the scan speed ranged from 300 to 1000 mm/s. Increasing the Y-axis scanning angle led to a stepped layer structure due to variations in deposition thickness, which negatively affected surface roughness and porosity, although the impact on hardness was minimal—indicating the feasibility of thin-layer fabrication. Optimization using machine learning and XAI reduced porosity to 5.49%, surface roughness to 4.6 µm, and increased hardness to 305.9 HV. The predicted and experimental values showed deviations within 5%, validating the effectiveness of the machine learning approach. By prioritizing high density and low roughness, the optimal processing conditions were suggested to be 260 W, 30<sup>o</sup>, and 700 mm/s. Compared with commercial electrical steel, the additively manufactured samples showed a 2% lower density, fourfold higher roughness, and 10% higher hardness, suggesting that with improved roughness control, L-PBF-based additive manufacturing could become a viable production route for electrical steel.

Korean Journal of Metals and MaterialsVol. 63(8)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.