Multi-fault rupturing of the 2019 Mw4.6 Rongxian shallow earthquake in the Sichuan Basin, China and its implication for hazard analysis
• Both geodetic and seismic data reveal the 2019 Rongxian earthquake ruptured two shallow, distinct faults. • Two foreshocks and the mainshock's first subevent facilitated the second subevent through pore pressure increase and fault reactivation due to hydraulic fracturing. • Multi-fault interactions pose challenges in seismic risk assessment for shallow industrial fluid injections. Multi-fault rupturing phenomena are crucial for understanding earthquake source processes and assessing their potential maximum magnitudes. Currently, the multi-fault phenomena have frequently been found for large tectonic earthquakes. For fractures at much smaller scales, multiple-crack events have also been observed in laboratory rock experiments. However, the phenomena are less reported for small-to-moderate earthquakes. In this study, we use both geodetic and seismic data to determine reliable rupture processes of the 2019 Mw 4.6 Rongxian earthquake in a shale gas field in the Sichuan Basin, China. Our results reveal that the Mw 4.6 mainshock ruptured two shallow, sub-parallel faults. This finding provides a bridge for understanding the complex source processes between tiny laboratory earthquakes and large tectonic earthquakes, and pose challenges to seismic risk and hazard assessment in areas associated with industrial productions.
Authors
- Wangwang Gu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2577-8041)
- Sidao Ni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2988-4850)
- Minhan Sheng
- Risheng Chu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1062-5982)
- Yong Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0695-5273)
Institutions
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Earth and Planetary Science Letters
- Published
- 2025-08-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2025.119569
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- earthquake and tectonic studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 7.47
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Chinese Academy of Sciences