Prognostic Value of Inflammatory Markers, CA 19-9, MELD Score, and ECOG in Stage 4 Gastric Cancer with Liver Metastases

Prognostic Value of Inflammatory Markers, CA MELD Score, and ECOG in Stage 4 Gastric Cancer with Liver Metastases Aim: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score in patients with stage 4 liver metastatic gastric cancer and to investigate whether other clinical pathological data are prognostic indicators.Methods: Stage 4 liver metastatic gastric cancer patients who were followed up retrospectively between January 2014 and November 2024 were included in the study.Demographic and clinical data of the patients were entered into the database.Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.Independent effects of prognostic factors were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model (Cox).Statistical significance was accepted as p<0.05.Results: One hundred and fifty patients were included in the study.The median age of the patients was 64 years, and 26.3% were female.The estimated median overall survival (mOS) was 7.9 months.The mOS was 10.5 months in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1 group compared to 3.6 months in the ECOG 2-3 group (p<0.001).According to the ideal cut-off value of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, survival was 9.7 months in the 37.1 U/mL group and 6.7 months in the >37.1 U/mL group (p=0.017).There was no difference in survival according to the determined categories of age (p=0.395),gender (p=0.670),smoking status (p=0.764),body mass index (BMI) (p=0.563),carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (p=0.057),neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p=0.359),platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (p=0.158),monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) (p=0.811), and MELD score (p=0.561).In univariate Cox regression analysis, an ECOG score of 2 and above [hazard ratio (HR) 4.03; p<0.001] and a CA 19-9>37.1 U/mL (HR 1.54; p=0.018) were determined as poor prognostic factors, and BMI, NLR, PLR, MLR, MELD score, and CEA did not show prognostic significance. Conclusion:We found that CA 19-9 level and ECOG performance status are markers that can be used in determining prognosis in liver metastatic gastric cancer, and the analyzed blood values (NLR, PLR, MLR) and MELD score did not demonstrate any prognostic significance in this patient group.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta haematologica oncologica Turcica.
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/ahot.galenos.2025.2025-5-4
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Value of Inflammatory Markers, CA 19-9, MELD Score, and ECOG in Stage 4 Gastric Cancer with Liver Metastases

Tülay Eren, Abdülkadir Koçanoğlu, Gökşen İnanç İmamoğlu, Esra Zeynelgil et al.
Acta haematologica oncologica Turcica.
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Prognostic Value of Inflammatory Markers, CA 19-9, MELD Score, and ECOG in Stage 4 Gastric Cancer with Liver Metastases

Tülay Eren, Abdülkadir Koçanoğlu, Gökşen İnanç İmamoğlu, Esra Zeynelgil, Yakup Düzköprü, Serkan Gülcü
article en

Abstract

Prognostic Value of Inflammatory Markers, CA MELD Score, and ECOG in Stage 4 Gastric Cancer with Liver Metastases Aim: This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score in patients with stage 4 liver metastatic gastric cancer and to investigate whether other clinical pathological data are prognostic indicators.Methods: Stage 4 liver metastatic gastric cancer patients who were followed up retrospectively between January 2014 and November 2024 were included in the study.Demographic and clinical data of the patients were entered into the database.Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test.Independent effects of prognostic factors were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model (Cox).Statistical significance was accepted as p<0.05.Results: One hundred and fifty patients were included in the study.The median age of the patients was 64 years, and 26.3% were female.The estimated median overall survival (mOS) was 7.9 months.The mOS was 10.5 months in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-1 group compared to 3.6 months in the ECOG 2-3 group (p<0.001).According to the ideal cut-off value of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, survival was 9.7 months in the 37.1 U/mL group and 6.7 months in the >37.1 U/mL group (p=0.017).There was no difference in survival according to the determined categories of age (p=0.395),gender (p=0.670),smoking status (p=0.764),body mass index (BMI) (p=0.563),carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (p=0.057),neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (p=0.359),platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (p=0.158),monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) (p=0.811), and MELD score (p=0.561).In univariate Cox regression analysis, an ECOG score of 2 and above [hazard ratio (HR) 4.03; p<0.001] and a CA 19-9>37.1 U/mL (HR 1.54; p=0.018) were determined as poor prognostic factors, and BMI, NLR, PLR, MLR, MELD score, and CEA did not show prognostic significance. Conclusion:We found that CA 19-9 level and ECOG performance status are markers that can be used in determining prognosis in liver metastatic gastric cancer, and the analyzed blood values (NLR, PLR, MLR) and MELD score did not demonstrate any prognostic significance in this patient group.

Acta haematologica oncologica Turcica.
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.