Individual Differences in Student Learning: A Comparison Between the Student Approaches to Learning and Concept-Building Frameworks

In cognitive science and education research, learning has been described to occur at surface and deep levels. Learners are thought to orient more toward one of these approaches to learning versus the other. In cognitive science, this has been assessed with a concept-building framework using objective function learning tasks to classify students as exemplar (surface) or abstraction (deep) learners. In education, the student approach to learning (SAL) framework has used self-report survey measures to classify learners as relying on surface approaches or deep approaches to learning. In two studies, we directly compared these two frameworks using self-report data from the Modified Approaches and Study Skills Inventory (M-ASSIST) and the Revised Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) along with objectively determined concept-building classifications from a computer-based function learning task. Potential links between exemplar learning and surface approaches and between abstraction learning and deep approaches were not found. We discuss possible explanations for the absence of empirical links, including inaccuracies in students' metacognitions regarding their learning, the measures, and possible differences between learning-content-dependencies of the survey responses versus content neutrality of the concept-building task. We conclude by suggesting directions for future work in assessing and comparing surface and deep learning across frameworks.