Excessive Downward Shortwave Radiation in the HRRR and RAP Weather Models and Testing Strategies for Improvements

Abstract A set of Surface Radiation Budget Network (SURFRAD) measurements across the lower 48 United States has allowed a closer inspection of weather model representations of downward shortwave radiation in the last several years. In this study, it is found that downward shortwave radiation (SW↓) is excessive for the NOAA 3-km HRRR model at each of the 14 SURFRAD stations distributed across the lower United States when averaged over 2-month periods. Possible causes for this station-consistent SW↓ bias error were hypothesized. Three were eliminated by this study and two were then evaluated in this study. We found that this error was not from clear-sky errors but from insufficient attenuation by clouds. It was also found that this cloud deficiency was partly caused by a dry bias in atmospheric water vapor initial conditions. New experiments using the hourly cycled HRRR model–assimilation system were designed and carried out for three seasons with modified data assimilation addressing the dry bias problem and reduction of effective radius for cloud water droplets for both explicit and subgrid-scale clouds. The assimilation and cloud optical parameter changes contributed similarly toward a combined reduced SW↓ radiation bias by 80% in the fall season and 84% in the winter season but by only 35% in the summer season. Even with the improved data assimilation, a dry bias contributing to deficient clouds continues, which is a topic to be explored in a following study. Significance Statement Weather forecasts of all durations are dependent on accurate forecasts of clouds. Even the well-known 3-km NOAA HRRR model was found to have errors in clouds, resulting in forecasts of too-warm near-surface temperatures and too little precipitation. In our study including model experiments in three different seasons, we found two key ideas that can improve future storm forecasts: better use of observations to start the weather models to avoid initial dryness and to brighten model cloud forecasts by assuming that cloud droplets are slightly smaller than previously prescribed. These changes can improve NOAA forecasts for aviation, energy, and severe weather in successors to the current HRRR weather model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Weather Review
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-25-0094.1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Excessive Downward Shortwave Radiation in the HRRR and RAP Weather Models and Testing Strategies for Improvements

Kelly A. Balmes, Anders A. Jensen, Joseph Sedlar, David D. Turner et al.
1 citations
Monthly Weather Review
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
1.30
article

Excessive Downward Shortwave Radiation in the HRRR and RAP Weather Models and Testing Strategies for Improvements

Kelly A. Balmes, Anders A. Jensen, Joseph Sedlar, David D. Turner, Laura Riihimaki, Stanley G. Benjamin, Eric James, John Augustine, Kathy Lantz
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract A set of Surface Radiation Budget Network (SURFRAD) measurements across the lower 48 United States has allowed a closer inspection of weather model representations of downward shortwave radiation in the last several years. In this study, it is found that downward shortwave radiation (SW↓) is excessive for the NOAA 3-km HRRR model at each of the 14 SURFRAD stations distributed across the lower United States when averaged over 2-month periods. Possible causes for this station-consistent SW↓ bias error were hypothesized. Three were eliminated by this study and two were then evaluated in this study. We found that this error was not from clear-sky errors but from insufficient attenuation by clouds. It was also found that this cloud deficiency was partly caused by a dry bias in atmospheric water vapor initial conditions. New experiments using the hourly cycled HRRR model–assimilation system were designed and carried out for three seasons with modified data assimilation addressing the dry bias problem and reduction of effective radius for cloud water droplets for both explicit and subgrid-scale clouds. The assimilation and cloud optical parameter changes contributed similarly toward a combined reduced SW↓ radiation bias by 80% in the fall season and 84% in the winter season but by only 35% in the summer season. Even with the improved data assimilation, a dry bias contributing to deficient clouds continues, which is a topic to be explored in a following study. Significance Statement Weather forecasts of all durations are dependent on accurate forecasts of clouds. Even the well-known 3-km NOAA HRRR model was found to have errors in clouds, resulting in forecasts of too-warm near-surface temperatures and too little precipitation. In our study including model experiments in three different seasons, we found two key ideas that can improve future storm forecasts: better use of observations to start the weather models to avoid initial dryness and to brighten model cloud forecasts by assuming that cloud droplets are slightly smaller than previously prescribed. These changes can improve NOAA forecasts for aviation, energy, and severe weather in successors to the current HRRR weather model.

Monthly Weather ReviewVol. 153(11)
University of Colorado Boulder (US), University of Colorado System (US), NOAA Global Systems Laboratory, NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.