Distribution Characteristics of Vertebral CT Hounsfield Unit Values in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

Study DesignRetrospective study.ObjectiveThis study aims to identify how CT HU values vary in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients with different scoliotic apexes and in those with different degree of scoliosis.MethodsWe included 222 DLS patients and 140 lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients, dividing the DLS patients into 2 groups based on scoliotic apex location. Patients were further categorized by T scores into osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic groups, and by Cobb angle into mild (<20°) and severe (>20°) scoliosis. We analyzed CT value distribution in these groups and compared the area under the curve (AUC) for predicting osteoporosis based on HU values from different vertebrae.ResultsCT HU values for L1 and L2 were significantly lower in the DLS group compared to LSS group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The lowest HU values in patients with a scoliotic apex at L2 or L2-3 were observed at the scoliotic apex region, while those with the scoliotic apex at L3, L3-4, and L4 had the lowest values at L3. This pattern was more pronounced in patients with a Cobb angle >20°. In the mild scoliosis group, the lowest CT value was found at L3 when the scoliotic apex was between L2 and L4. Additionally, L4 CT HU thresholds were better at distinguishing osteoporosis than other levels (<i>P</i> < 0.05), swhen the scoliotic apex was located at L2 or L2-3.ConclusionsCT HU values in DLS patients, particularly with a Cobb angle >20°, decrease at the scoliotic apex. Caution is required when using HU values from L1, L2, and L3 to assess osteoporosis in patients with a scoliotic apex at L2 and L2-3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Spine Journal
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251362138
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distribution Characteristics of Vertebral CT Hounsfield Unit Values in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

Weishi Li, Zhuoran Sun, Zhuofu Li, Ben Wang et al.
1 links
Global Spine Journal
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

Distribution Characteristics of Vertebral CT Hounsfield Unit Values in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

Weishi Li, Zhuoran Sun, Zhuofu Li, Ben Wang, Fei Xu, Shuai Jiang, Siyu Zhou
article en

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective study.ObjectiveThis study aims to identify how CT HU values vary in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients with different scoliotic apexes and in those with different degree of scoliosis.MethodsWe included 222 DLS patients and 140 lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients, dividing the DLS patients into 2 groups based on scoliotic apex location. Patients were further categorized by T scores into osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic groups, and by Cobb angle into mild (<20°) and severe (>20°) scoliosis. We analyzed CT value distribution in these groups and compared the area under the curve (AUC) for predicting osteoporosis based on HU values from different vertebrae.ResultsCT HU values for L1 and L2 were significantly lower in the DLS group compared to LSS group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The lowest HU values in patients with a scoliotic apex at L2 or L2-3 were observed at the scoliotic apex region, while those with the scoliotic apex at L3, L3-4, and L4 had the lowest values at L3. This pattern was more pronounced in patients with a Cobb angle >20°. In the mild scoliosis group, the lowest CT value was found at L3 when the scoliotic apex was between L2 and L4. Additionally, L4 CT HU thresholds were better at distinguishing osteoporosis than other levels (<i>P</i> < 0.05), swhen the scoliotic apex was located at L2 or L2-3.ConclusionsCT HU values in DLS patients, particularly with a Cobb angle >20°, decrease at the scoliotic apex. Caution is required when using HU values from L1, L2, and L3 to assess osteoporosis in patients with a scoliotic apex at L2 and L2-3.

Global Spine JournalVol. 16(2)
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (CN), Peking University (CN), Spinal Research (GB), Peking University Third Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.