Psychometric validation and correlates of the personal safety perception scale (PSPS-26) as a multidimensional measure of perceived safety

This study aims to develop and validate the Personal Safety Perception Scale (PSPS-26) as a wide-spectrum tool to capture the multidimensional construct of perceived personal safety. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1228 adults in Lebanon using an online survey. The PSPS-26 was developed through a modified Delphi technique and literature review, followed by expert consensus. The final 26-item scale was administered alongside validated measures of stress (PSQ-30), financial well-being (IFDFW), and health status (EQ-5D-5L). Construct validity was assessed using principal component analysis with Promax rotation, and reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to examine the associations between perceived safety and sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors. The PSPS-26 was validated with five factors: "Fear of Crime", "Safety Confidence", "Feeling Safe", "Neighborhood Walkability", and "Safety at Night", showing strong reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.835). Higher stress significantly associated with lower overall safety perception (Beta = - 0.158), especially in safety confidence (Beta = - 0.068) and safety at night (Beta = - 0.062). Enhanced health well-being significantly improved overall safety perception (Beta = 0.058) and feeling safe (Beta = 0.028). Financial well-being was positively and significantly correlated to overall safety perception (Beta = 0.204) and dimensions of fear of crime (Beta = 0.133), safety confidence (Beta = 0.033), and feeling safe (Beta = 0.035). Other significant factors included gender, health insurance coverage, access to healthcare, employment, education, residence area, and marital status. The PSPS-26 is a reliable and valid tool for assessing multidimensional personal safety perception. Its association with stress, health, and financial well-being underscores the importance of integrating psychological and socioeconomic factors into safety-related public health and policy strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13050-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychometric validation and correlates of the personal safety perception scale (PSPS-26) as a multidimensional measure of perceived safety

Mohamad Khaled Rahal, Pascale Salameh, Marwan Akel, Fouad Sakr et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Occupational Health and Safety Research
3.08
article

Psychometric validation and correlates of the personal safety perception scale (PSPS-26) as a multidimensional measure of perceived safety

Mohamad Khaled Rahal, Pascale Salameh, Marwan Akel, Fouad Sakr, Mariam Dabbous, Iqbal Fahs, Jihan Safwan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study aims to develop and validate the Personal Safety Perception Scale (PSPS-26) as a wide-spectrum tool to capture the multidimensional construct of perceived personal safety. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 1228 adults in Lebanon using an online survey. The PSPS-26 was developed through a modified Delphi technique and literature review, followed by expert consensus. The final 26-item scale was administered alongside validated measures of stress (PSQ-30), financial well-being (IFDFW), and health status (EQ-5D-5L). Construct validity was assessed using principal component analysis with Promax rotation, and reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to examine the associations between perceived safety and sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors. The PSPS-26 was validated with five factors: "Fear of Crime", "Safety Confidence", "Feeling Safe", "Neighborhood Walkability", and "Safety at Night", showing strong reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.835). Higher stress significantly associated with lower overall safety perception (Beta = - 0.158), especially in safety confidence (Beta = - 0.068) and safety at night (Beta = - 0.062). Enhanced health well-being significantly improved overall safety perception (Beta = 0.058) and feeling safe (Beta = 0.028). Financial well-being was positively and significantly correlated to overall safety perception (Beta = 0.204) and dimensions of fear of crime (Beta = 0.133), safety confidence (Beta = 0.033), and feeling safe (Beta = 0.035). Other significant factors included gender, health insurance coverage, access to healthcare, employment, education, residence area, and marital status. The PSPS-26 is a reliable and valid tool for assessing multidimensional personal safety perception. Its association with stress, health, and financial well-being underscores the importance of integrating psychological and socioeconomic factors into safety-related public health and policy strategies.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Inserm (FR), Lebanese University (LB), University of Nicosia (CY), Institut National de Santé Publique (GN), Institut d’Epidémiologie Neurologique et de Neurologie Tropicale (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Lebanese American University (LB), Université de Limoges (FR), Lebanese International University (LB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
3.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.