Classification and Analysis of IE-Based Zero-Thickness Metasurface Forward Solvers

The use of integral equation (IE)-based zero-thickness metasurface forward solvers has become prominent in recent years due to providing a computationally efficient means to analyze and design metasurface structures. This has led to the development of several independent methods that can be found in the literature. However, these works have largely been treated in isolation, which makes it difficult to recognize the similarities and differences between the methods. Herein, we aim to bridge these works by presenting a classification and analysis of the available IE-based zero-thickness metasurface forward solvers. This is enabled by the development of a unified mathematical framework that is used to analyze and compare the formulation of these methods. This procedure allows us to show that, under appropriate transformations, each method is in fact analytically equivalent. Despite this analytical equivalence, we highlight the numerical differences that exist and should be taken into account when using any of these solvers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ojap.2025.3595118
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification and Analysis of IE-Based Zero-Thickness Metasurface Forward Solvers

Mario Phaneuf, Puyan Mojabi
1 citations
IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation
Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
4.99
article

Classification and Analysis of IE-Based Zero-Thickness Metasurface Forward Solvers

Mario Phaneuf, Puyan Mojabi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The use of integral equation (IE)-based zero-thickness metasurface forward solvers has become prominent in recent years due to providing a computationally efficient means to analyze and design metasurface structures. This has led to the development of several independent methods that can be found in the literature. However, these works have largely been treated in isolation, which makes it difficult to recognize the similarities and differences between the methods. Herein, we aim to bridge these works by presenting a classification and analysis of the available IE-based zero-thickness metasurface forward solvers. This is enabled by the development of a unified mathematical framework that is used to analyze and compare the formulation of these methods. This procedure allows us to show that, under appropriate transformations, each method is in fact analytically equivalent. Despite this analytical equivalence, we highlight the numerical differences that exist and should be taken into account when using any of these solvers.

IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and PropagationVol. 6(6)
University of Manitoba (CA)
Canada Research Chairs, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
4.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Classification and Analysis of IE-Based Zero-Thickness Metasurface Forward Solvers — Mario Phaneuf, Puyan Mojabi · IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS