Energy-Accuracy Trade-Offs in Massive MIMO Signal Detection Using SRAM-Based In-Memory Computing

This paper investigates the use of SRAM-based in-memory computing (IMC) architectures for designing energy efficient and accurate signal detectors for massive multi-input multi-output (MIMO) systems. SRAM-based IMCs are the state-of-the-art for executing deep learning workloads in terms of energy efficiency and compute density. However, given the more stringent accuracy requirements of massive MIMO signal detection compared to deep learning, it remains an open question whether the energy efficiency benefits of IMCs can be preserved while meeting these accuracy requirements. This paper systematically explores the energy-accuracy trade-off in massive MIMO signal detectors designed using SRAM-based IMCs. Through transistor-level behavioral modeling and simulations in 28 nm CMOS process, we evaluate the energy per information bit (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$E_{\mathrm {b}}$</tex-math> </inline-formula>), error vector magnitude (EVM) and symbol error rate (SER) of linear detectors designed using SRAM-based IMCs for various wireless channels. We perform extensive design space exploration to determine the design parameters and operating conditions under which IMC-based linear detectors achieve significantly better energy efficiency than conventional digital implementations, while maintaining comparable accuracy. Our results show that IMC-based detectors can meet 3GPP EVM specifications for QPSK, 16-QAM, and 64-QAM across both real-world (Argos) and synthetic (WINNER-II) wireless channels, achieving <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$7.2\times $</tex-math> </inline-formula> to <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$11.7\times $</tex-math> </inline-formula> better energy efficiency than digital detectors while incurring <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\lt \mathrm {0.1~dB}$</tex-math> </inline-formula> penalty in receiver signal-to-noise ratio (RX SNR). We present extensive simulation results that provide insights into how parameters such as MIMO dimension, modulation scheme, precision of detection matrix, IMC bit-cell capacitance, IMC ADC precision, and ADC thermal noise impact the energy efficiency and accuracy of massive MIMO signal detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tcsi.2025.3594230
Primary Topic
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy-Accuracy Trade-Offs in Massive MIMO Signal Detection Using SRAM-Based In-Memory Computing

Naresh R. Shanbhag, Mihir Kavishwar
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
article

Energy-Accuracy Trade-Offs in Massive MIMO Signal Detection Using SRAM-Based In-Memory Computing

Naresh R. Shanbhag, Mihir Kavishwar
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the use of SRAM-based in-memory computing (IMC) architectures for designing energy efficient and accurate signal detectors for massive multi-input multi-output (MIMO) systems. SRAM-based IMCs are the state-of-the-art for executing deep learning workloads in terms of energy efficiency and compute density. However, given the more stringent accuracy requirements of massive MIMO signal detection compared to deep learning, it remains an open question whether the energy efficiency benefits of IMCs can be preserved while meeting these accuracy requirements. This paper systematically explores the energy-accuracy trade-off in massive MIMO signal detectors designed using SRAM-based IMCs. Through transistor-level behavioral modeling and simulations in 28 nm CMOS process, we evaluate the energy per information bit (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$E_{\mathrm {b}}$</tex-math> </inline-formula>), error vector magnitude (EVM) and symbol error rate (SER) of linear detectors designed using SRAM-based IMCs for various wireless channels. We perform extensive design space exploration to determine the design parameters and operating conditions under which IMC-based linear detectors achieve significantly better energy efficiency than conventional digital implementations, while maintaining comparable accuracy. Our results show that IMC-based detectors can meet 3GPP EVM specifications for QPSK, 16-QAM, and 64-QAM across both real-world (Argos) and synthetic (WINNER-II) wireless channels, achieving <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$7.2\times $</tex-math> </inline-formula> to <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$11.7\times $</tex-math> </inline-formula> better energy efficiency than digital detectors while incurring <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\lt \mathrm {0.1~dB}$</tex-math> </inline-formula> penalty in receiver signal-to-noise ratio (RX SNR). We present extensive simulation results that provide insights into how parameters such as MIMO dimension, modulation scheme, precision of detection matrix, IMC bit-cell capacitance, IMC ADC precision, and ADC thermal noise impact the energy efficiency and accuracy of massive MIMO signal detection.

IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersVol. 73(1)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.