Reliability of a German version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) administered via telephone

To date, there is no validated telephone version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) available to collect data about health-related quality of life among patients with heart failure (HF). We assessed the reliability of the German KCCQ administered via telephone in comparison to the self-administered version. Patients with HF admitted to the outpatient clinic of the University Hospital Würzburg were consecutively identified and recruited. Patients completed (a) the self-administered version of the KCCQ, and (b) the telephone-based interview performed by trained raters. The sequence of both approaches was randomized. For the between-method agreement, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated using a non-parametric, rank-based approach. We analysed data from sixty-one HF patients. The median KCCQ overall summary score was 84.8 (interquartile range (IQR) 71.6-76.9). The test-retest reliability between the self-administered and the telephone interview showed good agreement for the total symptom score, the clinical score and the overall summary core: ICC 0.75, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.79; ICC 0.80, CI 0.77-0.84; ICC 0.83, CI 0.80-0.86, respectively. The German KCCQ administered via telephone showed good test-retest reliability, indicating its applicability to collect data about health status among HF patients over the phone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14179-6
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability of a German version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) administered via telephone

Anna Grau, John A. Spertus, Jonas Widmann, Peter U. Heuschmann et al.
Scientific Reports
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Reliability of a German version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) administered via telephone

Anna Grau, John A. Spertus, Jonas Widmann, Peter U. Heuschmann, Viktoria Rücker, Jürgen Deckert, Martha Schutzmeier, Stefan Störk, Caroline Morbach
article en

Abstract

To date, there is no validated telephone version of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) available to collect data about health-related quality of life among patients with heart failure (HF). We assessed the reliability of the German KCCQ administered via telephone in comparison to the self-administered version. Patients with HF admitted to the outpatient clinic of the University Hospital Würzburg were consecutively identified and recruited. Patients completed (a) the self-administered version of the KCCQ, and (b) the telephone-based interview performed by trained raters. The sequence of both approaches was randomized. For the between-method agreement, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated using a non-parametric, rank-based approach. We analysed data from sixty-one HF patients. The median KCCQ overall summary score was 84.8 (interquartile range (IQR) 71.6-76.9). The test-retest reliability between the self-administered and the telephone interview showed good agreement for the total symptom score, the clinical score and the overall summary core: ICC 0.75, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.79; ICC 0.80, CI 0.77-0.84; ICC 0.83, CI 0.80-0.86, respectively. The German KCCQ administered via telephone showed good test-retest reliability, indicating its applicability to collect data about health status among HF patients over the phone.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Zimmer Biomet (Germany) (DE), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE)
Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss, Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.