State of the Field

Abstract Computational approaches, methodologies, and theoretical considerations for studying seafaring have developed rapidly in recent decades. However, these approaches often remained isolated from traditional archaeological discourse, with researchers working separately from each other and practitioners, while independently developing overlapping methodologies. Researchers can struggle to contextualize their work in this complex and rapidly developing field. Therefore, those interested in engaging with this discipline for the first time need a clear entry point. As we attempt to connect with each other to create improved, cohesive methodologies, we should learn from one another’s work to define and push the field forward. It is important to understand the interdisciplinary influences that established our shared history in order to assess what challenges we currently grapple with and anticipate what lies ahead. This review of the ‘State of the Field’ aims to evaluate the origins and development of this research. With a clear reference to historical development and scope of work, we create an initial framework for the discipline of computational analyses of seafaring, exploring current trends, as well as potential and future opportunities. Through synthesis and co-operation, computational, technological, and theoretical development can help us address new challenges and further our capabilities and data production as we move towards more diverse, interdisciplinary work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Maritime Archaeology
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11457-025-09454-6
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State of the Field

Helen Farr, Sara Zaia, Shimona Kealy, Marisa Borreggine et al.
2 citations
Journal of Maritime Archaeology
Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
16.55
article

State of the Field

Helen Farr, Sara Zaia, Shimona Kealy, Marisa Borreggine, Emma Slayton, Nicholas Bartos
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Computational approaches, methodologies, and theoretical considerations for studying seafaring have developed rapidly in recent decades. However, these approaches often remained isolated from traditional archaeological discourse, with researchers working separately from each other and practitioners, while independently developing overlapping methodologies. Researchers can struggle to contextualize their work in this complex and rapidly developing field. Therefore, those interested in engaging with this discipline for the first time need a clear entry point. As we attempt to connect with each other to create improved, cohesive methodologies, we should learn from one another’s work to define and push the field forward. It is important to understand the interdisciplinary influences that established our shared history in order to assess what challenges we currently grapple with and anticipate what lies ahead. This review of the ‘State of the Field’ aims to evaluate the origins and development of this research. With a clear reference to historical development and scope of work, we create an initial framework for the discipline of computational analyses of seafaring, exploring current trends, as well as potential and future opportunities. Through synthesis and co-operation, computational, technological, and theoretical development can help us address new challenges and further our capabilities and data production as we move towards more diverse, interdisciplinary work.

Journal of Maritime ArchaeologyVol. 20(3)
Australian National University (AU), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Harvard University Press (US), University of Southampton (GB), Carnegie Mellon University (US), Stanford University (US)
Carnegie Mellon University
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
16.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.