Timing of Newborn Hearing Screening Effects on Passing Rates: A Prospective Cohort Study

Newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) is essential for early detection of hearing impairment. The Joint Committee on Infant Hearing recommends screening near hospital discharge but does not specify an optimal timing. To determine the optimal timing for TEOAE screening in neonates at low risk of hearing impairment and to identify perinatal factors influencing pass rates.Neonates underwent sequential TEOAE screening based on postnatal age at the time of testing: less than 24, 24 to 36, 36 to 48, and more than 48 hours, with follow-up at 1 month for persistent failures. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact test to compare pass rates across time intervals and multivariate Cox's proportional hazards regression and Laplace regression to assess factors associated with screening outcomes.Among 408 neonates, the median passing age was 23.8 hours (interquartile range: 14.3). Pass rates improved with later screening: 53.7% at less than 24 hours, 80.1% at 24 to 36 hours, 92.6% at 36 to 48 hours, and 99.3% at more than 48 hours. A significant improvement was observed only at more than 48 hours (odds ratio: 5.26; <i>p</i> = 0.0153). Cesarean delivery was associated with delayed passing compared with vaginal delivery (<i>p</i> = 0.036). Late preterm neonates demonstrated a significantly delayed passing time of approximately 12.9 hours (<i>p</i> < 0.01), whereas small for gestational age neonates passed earlier by 8.2 hours (<i>p</i> = 0.021).Screening at greater than or equal to 48 hours significantly improved pass rates. An older age at successful screening was observed among preterm neonates and those delivered by cesarean section, underscoring the need for tailored follow-up protocols. These findings highlight the importance of optimizing screening strategies to enhance early detection and intervention. · The ideal timing for newborn hearing screening remains unclear, affecting accuracy and follow-up rates.. · Early TEOAE screening may lead to high false positives due to residual ear fluid, increasing unnecessary follow-ups.. · Optimizing timing of the hearing screening window can enhance accuracy, reduce false positives, and improve clinical efficiency..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2675-1768
Primary Topic
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Timing of Newborn Hearing Screening Effects on Passing Rates: A Prospective Cohort Study

Pichada Saengrat, Wongsathon Seehiranwong
American Journal of Perinatology
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
article

Timing of Newborn Hearing Screening Effects on Passing Rates: A Prospective Cohort Study

Pichada Saengrat, Wongsathon Seehiranwong
article en

Abstract

Newborn hearing screening using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) is essential for early detection of hearing impairment. The Joint Committee on Infant Hearing recommends screening near hospital discharge but does not specify an optimal timing. To determine the optimal timing for TEOAE screening in neonates at low risk of hearing impairment and to identify perinatal factors influencing pass rates.Neonates underwent sequential TEOAE screening based on postnatal age at the time of testing: less than 24, 24 to 36, 36 to 48, and more than 48 hours, with follow-up at 1 month for persistent failures. Statistical analyses included Fisher's exact test to compare pass rates across time intervals and multivariate Cox's proportional hazards regression and Laplace regression to assess factors associated with screening outcomes.Among 408 neonates, the median passing age was 23.8 hours (interquartile range: 14.3). Pass rates improved with later screening: 53.7% at less than 24 hours, 80.1% at 24 to 36 hours, 92.6% at 36 to 48 hours, and 99.3% at more than 48 hours. A significant improvement was observed only at more than 48 hours (odds ratio: 5.26; <i>p</i> = 0.0153). Cesarean delivery was associated with delayed passing compared with vaginal delivery (<i>p</i> = 0.036). Late preterm neonates demonstrated a significantly delayed passing time of approximately 12.9 hours (<i>p</i> < 0.01), whereas small for gestational age neonates passed earlier by 8.2 hours (<i>p</i> = 0.021).Screening at greater than or equal to 48 hours significantly improved pass rates. An older age at successful screening was observed among preterm neonates and those delivered by cesarean section, underscoring the need for tailored follow-up protocols. These findings highlight the importance of optimizing screening strategies to enhance early detection and intervention. · The ideal timing for newborn hearing screening remains unclear, affecting accuracy and follow-up rates.. · Early TEOAE screening may lead to high false positives due to residual ear fluid, increasing unnecessary follow-ups.. · Optimizing timing of the hearing screening window can enhance accuracy, reduce false positives, and improve clinical efficiency..

American Journal of PerinatologyVol. 43(05)
Navamindradhiraj University (TH), Vajira Hospital (TH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.